Confusion over start of gay marriages
next month in Florida
Send a link to a friend
[December 23, 2014]
By Bill Cotterell
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (Reuters) - Florida
court officials, citing confusion after the U.S. Supreme Court declined
to extend a stay on the state's same-sex marriage ban, agreed on Monday
to ask a federal judge to clarify where gay couples may begin to tie the
knot next month.
|
When the stay expires after Jan. 5, it is unclear if weddings are
permitted beyond the one county in northern Florida that was named
in the case appealed to the high court.
On a conference call on Monday, the state's clerks of court were
"close to unanimous" in agreement that same-sex marriages would
become legal only in rural Washington County, said Bob Inzer, the
clerk in Leon County in Tallahassee.
The ruling "does not apply to the clerks of the state’s other 66
counties," agreed Ronnie Fussell, the clerk in Duval County in
Jacksonville, noting in a statement that clerks could face a fine
and jail time for issuing marriage licenses in violation of state
law.
Florida's clerks plan to seek guidance from U.S. District Judge
Robert Hinkle of Florida's Northern District, who in August became
the first federal judge to strike down the same-sex marriage ban
approved by state voters in 2008, Inzer said.
Gay marriage advocates warned that counties will be hit by costly
lawsuits if they refuse to issue licenses when Hinkle's order takes
effect early next year.
"Clerks can stand in the doorway and try to block equality, or they
can welcome gay couples who have waited for decades for this
moment," said Nadine Smith, chief executive officer of Equality
Florida, an advocacy group.
[to top of second column] |
The high court's order, issued on Friday, would make Florida the
36th U.S. states to have legal gay marriage.
Concerns about "uniformity throughout Florida" were cited by Florida
Attorney General Pam Bondi, who asked the Supreme Court to extend
the stay while various cases make their way through the appeals
process in different states and federal circuits.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia dissented from the
decision of the other justices to deny Bondi's request.
(Editing by Letitia Stein and Mohammad Zargham)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|