| 
			
			 Officials fear that without limiting the defense budget, the 
			government will have to raise taxes, increase the pension age or 
			print money to prevent the state deficit from running out of 
			control. 
 Despite a crisis brought on by diving oil markets and Western 
			sanctions, they believe Russia can muddle through next year provided 
			the price of crude, its dominant export earner, holds near current 
			levels.
 
 But even at $60 per barrel, the present oil price is little more 
			than half what the Kremlin needs to balance the budget, and it is 
			quickly running out of money.
 
 Without radical action, the officials are much less confident about 
			2016-17 - and even sooner, should global oil prices continue their 
			slide towards $40.
 
 One senior government source expressed concern about the effects of 
			an unchecked deficit on one of Russia's two funds built up from past 
			oil income.
 
 "If no spending is cut and revenue risks persist, we will have a 
			deficit of 4 trillion rubles. The Reserve Fund will be spent within 
			18 months," he said. "In 2016 we will have no resources to meet our 
			budget obligations. Not to mention 2017."
 
			
			 
			  
			At current exchange rates, 4 trillion rubles equates to $71 billion, 
			not far from the $89 billion that the Reserve Fund now holds.
 Sanctions imposed by the European Union and United States over 
			Moscow's role in the Ukraine crisis have deepened the problems: 
			foreign investment is down sharply, more than $100 billion has fled 
			abroad this year, Russian firms and banks have lost access to 
			international capital markets and privatization plans are on hold.
 
 The central bank has had to spend heavily from its reserves, which 
			have dropped to just below $400 billion from $510 billion at the 
			start of 2014, to arrest a steep slide in the rouble.
 
 DEFENSE DRAIN
 
 Spending will be cut 10 percent next year but Finance Minister Anton 
			Siluanov said last week that this was not enough to balance the 
			budget. Expenditure is dominated by social and defense commitments, 
			and Putin had set military investment as a priority even before the 
			stand-off with the West began when Russia annexed Crimea from 
			Ukraine in March.
 
 Out of total spending of 13.96 trillion rubles ($248 billion) in 
			2014, social benefits account for over 33 percent, and defense and 
			security 32.5 percent.
 
 Next year, military spending will rise to 35 percent of the 15.51 
			trillion rouble budget. That means about $100 billion for defense 
			and security at today's exchange rates.
 
 At the same time, the weaker rouble will lead to higher inflation 
			next year by pushing up import costs, threatening Putin's reputation 
			for safeguarding Russians' living standards.
 
 The lion's share of social spending goes on pensions, and this will 
			rise sharply due a rapidly aging population unless the government 
			takes radical action by raising the retirement age from 55 years for 
			women and 60 for men.
 
 "Without cutting military spending and raising the pension age, we 
			won't muddle through. What options do we have? Raise taxes and print 
			money, which triggers a downward spiral of inflation and higher 
			interest rates," the government source said.
 
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
 
			"DRAMATIC DEVELOPMENT"
 In the shorter term, the biggest economic risk would be a further 
			plunge in oil prices, even if they bounced back rapidly. A drop to 
			$40 for just a few days could inflict great psychological damage.
 
			Earlier this month, the rouble fell as much as 20 percent against 
			the dollar in one day after oil plunged and the central bank raised 
			its main interest rate sharply. The authorities were forced to 
			impose informal capital controls to cool the panic and slow the 
			flood of money out of the country.
 Putin has said formal capital controls are not on the agenda. 
			Officials are anxious to avoid such drastic action as this would 
			inflict long-term damage on Russia's international financial 
			reputation: investors will put money into a country only if they 
			believe they can take the profits back out later.
 
 "We won't introduce capital controls unless there is a dramatic 
			development," said a top-level government source. "I don't know if 
			$40 per barrel will trigger it. For our country it is very bad, it 
			is a tragedy. But whether it will trigger capital controls or not, I 
			just don't know," the source said.
 
 In December 2008, oil fell during the global financial crisis to 
			around $36 but even then Russia did not reinstate capital controls.
 
			"This crisis is more psychological, more emotional than those we 
			have seen in the past. But in principle, the situation is not very 
			different from 2008. We can always switch to measures we used in 
			2009," the source said, naming state guarantees and direct funding 
			of troubled companies among possible measures.
 
			
			 
			However, former finance minister Alexei Kudrin said the current 
			crisis was different because of the sanctions. "To come out of the 
			crisis, the government and the president should settle the conflict 
			with leading powers, mainly Europe and the United States," he said 
			last week.
 
 However, the top-level government source held out little hope for an 
			easing of tensions with Washington. "Relations with the United 
			States are frozen," he said.
 
 ($1 = 56.2950 rubles)
 
 (Additional reporting by Alexander Winning; Writing by Dmitry 
			Zhdannikov; editing by David Stamp)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |