| 
			 Defense attorneys countered, saying Michael Dunn, 47, who is 
			white, acted in self-defense when he shot Jordan Davis and was 
			justified in using deadly force. 
 			The trial, which has drawn international attention because of racial 
			overtones and claims of self-defense, was put in the hands of a jury 
			on Wednesday.
 			Davis was out on the town with friends when the argument broke out. 
			Prosecutors said Davis used foul language when confronting Dunn, but 
			that he was unarmed and never posed a physical threat.
 			"Jordan Davis didn't have a weapon. He had a big mouth. That man 
			wasn't going to stand for it, and it cost Jordan Davis his life," 
			Assistant State Attorney John Guy said, wrapping up the 
			prosecution's case at the end of a week-long trial.
 			"This case is not about self-defense. It's about self-denial," he 
			added.
 			The case has drawn comparisons to the trial of George Zimmerman, the 
			former central Florida neighborhood watchman who was acquitted last 
			year of murder after saying he shot a 17-year-old unarmed black 
			teenager, Trayvon Martin, in self-defense during a struggle. 			
			
			 
 			Dunn is charged with first-degree murder in the November 2012 
			shooting of Jordan Davis. Dunn also faces three charges of attempted 
			murder for firing 10 shots at four teens in the SUV parked in a 
			Jacksonville gas station.
 			Prosecutors said Dunn overreacted in anger when Davis hurled 
			expletives at him and refused to lower the volume.
 			"This defendant was disrespected by a 17-year-old teenager. He was 
			not happy with his (Davis's) response," said another Assistant State 
			Attorney Erin Wolfson who delivered the closing argument.
 			She quoted a witness who overheard Dunn say: "You are not going to 
			talk to me that way" as the altercation escalated.
 			Then Dunn "took it upon himself to silence Jordan Davis forever," 
			Wolfson said.
 			If found guilty, Dunn faces up to life in prison. Prosecutors say 
			they will not seek the death penalty.
 			The verdict in the case remains in doubt, CNN legal analyst Sunny 
			Hostin, a former assistant U.S. attorney, tweeted on Tuesday night. 
			"Especially in Florida, given the breadth of the stand your ground 
			law and self-defense culture," she said.
 			Deliberating the case is a jury of 8 whites, 2 blacks, one Asian and 
			one Hispanic.
 			Dunn's attorney, Cory Strolla, said the state had failed to prove 
			its case, pointing to a lack of conclusive forensic evidence about 
			where Davis was when he was shot. 			
			
			 
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			"Michael Dunn was in a place where he had a right to be, asking for 
			a common courtesy. He had no duty to retreat. He had a right to meet 
			force with force, including deadly force," said Strolla. "He's had 
			that gun for 20 years and he has never fired it once."
 			Dunn took the stand in his own defense on Tuesday and told the jury 
			he started shooting in a state of panic after the exchange of words 
			grew more heated and he thought he saw the barrel of a gun in the 
			back window as Davis started to get out of the car.
 			Police said they found no weapon in the teens' SUV after the 
			shooting.
 			"Michael Dunn doesn't get to just assume Jordan Davis had a gun and 
			... was going to shoot him," said Wolfson. "Self-defense does not 
			let you assume."
 			The prosecution sought to expose inconsistencies in Dunn's version 
			of the incident.
 			The jury was reminded of dramatic testimony by Dunn's fiancée, 
			Rhonda Rouer, who told the court that after the shooting Dunn never 
			mentioned seeing a gun in the teens' car.
 			Medical evidence presented in court also showed that Davis died 
			inside the car in a defensive posture.
 			Dunn's description of some of the expletives used in the altercation 
			varied in court from a previous recorded account he gave to police. 			
			
			 
 			In his closing argument, Strolla said the teens could have disposed 
			of a weapon after they left the gas station.
 			To illustrate his point, Strolla stood mute in front of the jury for 
			three minutes, the time the Durango was gone before returning to the 
			gas station to get help.
 			Strolla criticized investigators for failing to secure the entire 
			gas station plaza as a crime scene or search for a weapon that 
			night.
 			"They knew they messed up," Strolla said.
 			(Writing by David Adams and Barbara Liston; 
editing by Ken Wills, Gunna Dickson and Leslie Adler) 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |