The fact is, we make most, if not all, of our decisions based on the
assumption we are acting on truth. Even if we think there is a
little “fudging” in the telling, we still assume the foundation of
the information is based on truth. When it comes to investing our
money, buying a house or car, or having an operation based on what
the doctor has told us, we hear the words spoken and understand them
in their conventional meaning and accept them as truth. With that
truth we enter into the agreement that places our resources, and
perhaps our very lives, in the hands of the person who is speaking
the information and hope it is the truth so as when we proceed with
our decision of action it will be on the foundation of truth rather
than a lie.
Even though we try to separate out the basis for our moral standing
by pushing away Biblical principles form the public sector of life,
we have to depend on the basic morality of telling the truth simply
to engage in commerce. When God gave the “Ten Commandments” to Moses
and he brought them to the people, it was to establish a standard of
living and interaction between the people not only in their
relationship with God, but with each other as well. When a people
understand the meaning of the Ten Commandments they understand they
are standards that provide a civic order on which people may live
and interact with each other through relationship. That relationship
has to be built on trust so that commerce can proceed smoothly and
with equity. One of the Commandments read thus:
“You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.” (Exodus
20:16)
A simple command, simply stated, but a powerful life-affirming
necessity has been wrapped up in this simple statement. Perhaps this
is the basis for court testimony when a person is under oath;
perhaps it is a command that affirms the truth is greater and more
stable than a lie. In our own court system this statement has been
unpacked in the following oath to be affirmed before the witness
takes the stand:
“Do you solemnly swear (or affirm) to tell the truth, the whole
truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?”
What could be any more complete than that? By answering, “I do” to
that question the person has stepped onto a foundation of truth that
is expected at all costs. First, the person must affirm “to tell the
truth.” In our society that is a golden foundation because every
action that follows that truth is a series of actions and decisions
that are carried out on the basis of that truth. Words have
consequences; truth has consequences; and, lies also have
consequences. To cement the witness into the foundation of truth
even further, he is asked to affirm he is telling “the whole truth.”
Leaving nothing out, adding nothing to color the truth with bias or
innuendo, but the “whole” truth. That leaves no room in the
statement except what confirms the truth. Finally, the witness is
asked to affirm, “Nothing but the truth.” The truth is paramount; it
is complete, solid, unshakable, reliable, consistent and permanent.
Upon that foundation of truth the very life of an individual may be
in balance; it will determine the action of condemning to death or
setting the person free.
[to top of second column]
|
So now we have reached a point in our society where we are depending
on leaders who have promised to tell the truth in all their dealings
with establishing, implementing and enforcing laws under which we
must all live. But we have found it is almost the norm for those
leaders to play fast and loose with the truth. They are placing the
yoke of restrictive law and regulation on the necks of the average
citizen without encumbering themselves with the same laws and
regulations. They are changing the meanings of their words from
conventional, traditional meanings that brought understanding, to
meanings that slip and slide through the maze of double-talk that
manipulate the citizens into thinking they are “transparent” when
they are double-dealing in the darkness of shadows.
When we are told one thing when the opposite is discovered after it
has been imposed on the masses, it means the official who promised
to tell the truth did not do so. When reasons for calamities are
made-up reasons spouted across the land when the official person
speaking knows it is a false reason, it means the official who
promised to tell the truth did not tell the whole truth. When we are
told by our officials they were unaware of the law-breaking
occurring under their watch and only discovered it by seeing it on
television, it means the official who promised to tell the truth
failed to tell, “Nothing but the truth.”
Never mind not following the Commandment of God regarding telling
the truth, these people disregard the laws of our land regarding the
truth. How can the American people trust someone in power who
continually fails even to live by the court edict to, “Tell the
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?”
Our first clue that they know the truth, but plan to lie, is when
they hide behind “Executive Privilege” and refuse to place
themselves “under oath” at Congressional Hearings or investigations.
We need to ask ourselves, “Do we really need these people as our
leaders?”
[By JIM KILLEBREW]
Click here to respond to the editor about this
article. |