According to Pentagon documents reviewed by Reuters, chief U.S.
arms buyer Frank Kendall allowed two F-35 suppliers, Northrop
Grumman Corp and Honeywell International Inc, to use Chinese magnets
for the new warplane's radar system, landing gears and other
hardware. Without the waivers, both companies could have faced
sanctions for violating federal law and the F-35 program could have
faced further delays.
"It was a pretty big deal and an unusual situation because there's a
prohibition on doing defense work in China, even if it's
inadvertent," said Frank Kenlon, who recently retired as a senior
Pentagon procurement official and now teaches at American
University. "I'd never seen this happen before."
The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of
Congress, is examining three such cases involving the F-35, the U.S.
military's next generation fighter, the documents show.
The GAO report, due March 1, was ordered by U.S. lawmakers, who say
they are concerned that Americans firms are being shut out of the
specialty metals market, and that a U.S. weapon system may become
dependent on parts made by a potential future adversary.
The waivers apply to inexpensive parts, including $2 magnets,
installed on 115 F-35 test, training and production aircraft, the
last of which are due to be delivered in May 2014. Lawmakers noted
that several U.S. companies make similar magnets.
Kendall said the waivers were needed to keep production, testing and
training of the Pentagon's newest warplane on track; avert millions
of dollars in retrofit costs; and prevent delays in the Marine
Corps' plan to start using the jets in combat from mid-2015,
according to the documents. In one case, it would cost $10.8 million
and take about 25,000 man-hours to remove the Chinese-made magnets
and replace them with American ones, the documents indicate.
Lockheed is developing the F-35, the Pentagon's costliest arms
program, for the United States and eight countries that helped fund
its development: Britain, Canada, Australia, Italy, Norway, Turkey,
Denmark and the Netherlands. Israel and Japan have also placed
orders for the jet.
The program is already years behind schedule and 70 percent over
initial cost estimates. At the time Kendall was granting the
waivers, officials were acutely worried that further delays and cost
increases would erode the foreign orders needed to drive down the
future cost of each warplane.
In the documents, Kendall underscored the importance of the F-35
program to ensure continued U.S. military superiority and counter
potential emerging threats from nations developing their own stealth
fighter jets, including Russia and China.
He said additional delays would force the United States and its
allies to keep its legacy fighters flying longer, which would result
in higher maintenance costs. It would also leave them with older
jets, which Kendall said "cannot match the offensive and defensive
capabilities provided by F-35."
The Pentagon first disclosed problems with non-U.S. magnets in a
little-noticed written statement to Congress in the spring of 2013.
But the statement did not name companies involved and did not
disclose that some of the parts came from China.
Officials at Northrop, Honeywell and Lockheed declined to comment on
the issue, referring queries to the Pentagon.
Joe DellaVedova, spokesman for the F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO)
at the Pentagon, said the office was committed to ensuring that
federal defense acquisition laws were strictly followed.
"There was never any risk of technology transfer or other security
breach associated with these manufacturing compliance issues," he
said. "The JPO is working with industry to put in place long-term
solutions to avoid the need for future waivers."
In his statement to Congress, Kendall said he took the matter
"extremely seriously" and said Lockheed was told to take aggressive
steps to identify any further cases, and correct its compliance
process.
[to top of second column] |
Bill Greenwalt, a former senior defense official and now an analyst
with the American Enterprise Institute think tank, said the risk to
national security appeared low since the magnets in question had no
programmable hardware.
However, he added: "This is an area that will need considerable due
diligence in the future to ensure that components for more high-risk
applications are safe from potential tampering and foreign
mischief."
SPECIALTY METALS
Since 1973, U.S. laws have banned the procurement of specialty
metals produced outside the United States for use on U.S. weapons. A
separate 2006 law also bans the purchase of end-use items and
components that include such specialty metals.
The documents reviewed by Reuters show that Northrop first
discovered the use of non-compliant Japanese magnets on the Active
Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar it builds for the F-35 in
August 2012, alerting the prime contractor, Lockheed, which then
told the Pentagon.
A subsequent investigation of all parts on the F-35 turned up two
more cases in which non-U.S. specialty metals were used on the
F-35's radar, and on target assemblies built by Honeywell that are
used for positioning doors and landing gear.
Northrop's radar was also found to contain $2 magnets made by
Chengdu Magnetic Material Science & Technology Co, in China's
Sichuan region, according to the documents.
The magnets used on the Honeywell target assemblies were acquired
through Illinois-based Dexter Magnetic Technologies Inc.
Dexter and Chengdu Magnetic did not immediately respond to requests
for comment.
KNOWING AND WILLFUL?
In June, the House Armed Services Committee asked the GAO to
determine whether the companies involved "knowingly and willfully"
supplied non-compliant magnets, and how the Pentagon investigated
that question. The committee also asked GAO for recommendations on
potential changes, such as fines or penalties for non-compliance to
deter future problems, as well as suggestions for beefing up
Pentagon supply chain management procedures.
In a document approving use of Chinese magnets on the batch of 32
F-35 fighter planes now being built, Kendall said neither Lockheed
nor Northrop knowingly allowed the parts to be used.
In his waiver, Kendall wrote that Northrop's initial mistake,
involving magnets built in Japan, was an "administrative oversight"
and noted the firm quickly reported the matter when it was
discovered in August 2012. It led to the comprehensive review that
found two additional issues involving Chinese-built magnets.
It is not clear from the waiver documents whether Kendall determined
that Honeywell's use of Chinese-built magnets involved a similar
mistake.
(Editing by Michael Williams, Tiffany Wu and Grant McCool)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|