| 
             Though the central bank's 16-month-old bond-buying program is meant 
			to boost the U.S. economy, in the past it has lifted currencies and 
			stocks in emerging markets that have benefited from a rush of 
			international investment and the resulting lower interest rates. 
 			Now that the Fed intends to wind down the unprecedented policy 
			accommodation by later this year, those markets — especially in 
			countries with large current account deficits — have dropped hard, 
			prompting policy responses late last week from central banks around 
			the world.
 			But the turmoil would probably have to escalate dramatically and 
			start to hurt the United States for the Fed, focused on domestic 
			improvements in the world's largest economy, to back down from 
			trimming the asset-purchase program known as quantitative easing, or 
			QE.
 			"When we started QE ... there were many economies and emerging 
			markets and other places that were very critical of our policy. Now 
			that we're trying to stop it, they've been very critical of our 
			policy," Charles Plosser, president of the Philadelphia Fed, said in 
			a January 14 speech in his hometown. 			
 
 			"We are aware of those things," he added. "But the way the Fed 
			thinks about it is, if the monetary policy that we have is the best 
			for the U.S. economy, then that's the policy that we ought to pursue 
			because a strong U.S. economy would be good for most of the rest of 
			the world."
 			Such reasoning is held throughout the ranks of top Fed policymakers, 
			who are mandated by law to pursue maximum sustainable employment and 
			steady and low inflation in the United States.
 			Fed officials privately say they try to be as transparent and 
			predictable as possible so that U.S. policy changes do not shock 
			foreign counterparts. And they point out that countries such as 
			Mexico that better manage their budgets are often unscathed by 
			investors searching for risky or safe-haven assets, depending on 
			U.S. policy changes.
 			NOT FLINCHING
 			At a meeting that ends Wednesday in Washington, the Fed is widely 
			expected to trim its monthly purchases of Treasuries and mortgage 
			bonds to $65 billion from $75 billion, after it made a similar 
			$10-billion cut at a December meeting. 
            Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has said the bond-buying program would 
			likely be completely wound down by later this year, as long as the 
			U.S. economy and labor market continue to improve on the back of a 
			pick-up in growth in the second half of 2013. 
            
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			Though the Fed has fairly well telegraphed its intentions, last 
			spring emerging markets sold off sharply when Bernanke merely talked 
			of the prospect of reducing QE.
 			Now that the tapering has begun, the idea of less U.S. stimulus 
			combined with slower Chinese growth and specific concerns in some 
			countries led last week to a full-scale flight from emerging-market 
			assets that could continue this week.
 			The selloff accelerated on Friday, prompting Argentina to abandon 
			its support for the peso. The day before, Turkey's central bank 
			resorted to what analysts said were its first direct interventions 
			since 2012 in the lira, which hit a record low on Friday.
 			Central banks of several emerging markets were also believed to have 
			intervened to defend their currencies including India, Taiwan and 
			Malaysia.
 			The selling did not spare stocks in the United States, where the 
			benchmark S&P 500 index dropped 2 percent on Friday. But, as Dallas 
			Fed President Richard Fischer said this month, he "would not flinch" 
			from trimming the bond-buying even in the face of a stock market 
			correction.
 			The Fed, which has held interest rates near zero for five years to 
			battle the recession's fallout, could acknowledge the 
			emerging-market turmoil in its Wednesday policy statement. But it is 
			all but certain to continue what Bernanke called "measured" cuts to 
			the asset purchases.
 			"It takes a pretty severe downgrading of foreign growth to have a 
			noticeable effect of the U.S. economic outlook," said Michael Feroli, 
			chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan.
 			"Thus far it is not even certain that a few days of international 
			financial stress is enough to change the global economic prospects, 
			much less effect the U.S. economy." 						
			 
 			(Reporting by Jonathan Spicer; editing 
			by David Gregorio) 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |