Californians spent $250
million on excessive health premiums, group says
Send a link to a friend
[July 03, 2014]
By Sharon Bernstein
SACRAMENTO Calif. (Reuters)
- Californians paid a quarter of a billion dollars in
health insurance premiums during a 15-month period ended
last year that were deemed excessive by state
regulators, a consumer group said Wednesday.
|
Santa Monica-based Consumer Watchdog, which released the figures on
Wednesday, is pushing Proposition 45, a ballot initiative that would
give regulators the power to reject rate increases determined to be
excessive.
"Patients are powerless against these rate increases," said Paul
Song, a physician and activist based in Los Angeles who is working
to support the ballot initiative. "This system has been deleterious
to our patients."
Using data from the California Department of Insurance and the
California Department of Managed Healthcare, the organization said
that from April 1, 2012 though November 1, 2013, regulators found
$250 million worth of planned insurance increases for people who buy
their own individual insurance policies to be unreasonable, the
group said.
Their ballot measure, which is supported by California Insurance
Commissioner Dave Jones, would give regulators the power to approve
or deny proposed rate increases.
"Over 1 million Californians were forced to pay excessive rates
because our determination is not binding," Jones said at a
legislative hearing on the proposed ballot initiative in Sacramento
on Wednesday. Had he been granted the power to deny insurance
companies rate increases deemed excessive, the $250 million in
unwarranted premium increases would not have been allowed, Jones
said.
The initiative, which has already been approved for the November
2014 ballot, has drawn opposition from a insurance companies, which
say it will limit their ability to manage the costs of providing
care. The California Medical Association, which represents doctors,
has said it could lead insurers to reduce the rates paid to
physicians by limiting the ability of insurance companies to set
rates as needed.
[to top of second column] |
Peter Lee, head of California's insurance exchange set up under the
Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, said he worried that giving the
state insurance commissioner veto power over rates could cause
insurers to leave the state.
Such power could also undermine the exchange's role in negotiating
rates for its own customers with the insurance plans, Lee said.
But Jones, the state insurance commissioner, said those concerns
were unwarranted.
(Reporting by Sharon Bernstein; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|