| 
             Some on Wall Street wonder if Amazon may have bitten off more than 
			it can chew. After an unusually busy first half of the year that saw 
			the online retailer spend on developing everything from mobile 
			phones and Hollywood-style production to grocery deliveries, 
			investors are ready to see it curtail its ambitions and start 
			delivering sustainable profits. 
 Or at least offer evidence that Bezos' ever-increasing investments 
			are going to soon generate appealing returns for its main online 
			retailing business.
 
 "It does get frustrating when they continue to spend quarter after 
			quarter and they don't let the revenue flow through," said Michael 
			Scanlon, who manages $3.5 billion at Manulife Asset Management and 
			holds shares of Amazon. "I'm definitely ready for profits."
 
 Others argue that easing off on the throttle now may thwart its goal 
			of becoming the Wal-Mart of online retail. That is particularly the 
			case as China's Alibaba - which handles more ecommerce than Amazon 
			and eBay Inc combined - slowly develops a U.S. consumer presence and 
			prepares for an initial public offering in the U.S.
 
             
			BIG SELLING POINT
 Bezos insists on taking the long view. In his letter to shareholders 
			last year, he responded to criticism about spending by saying 
			investing in a "just-in-time fashion would be too clever by half."
 
 Its increasing share of the retail dollar is still a big selling 
			point for investors.
 
 "You have to take a long-term perspective and you have to buy in 
			that you're going to see solid topline growth," said Needham & Co 
			analyst Kerry Rice.
 
 But that market share grab comes at a price a price that was 
			highlighted in its second-quarter results issued on Thursday. Amazon 
			reported its largest quarterly loss since 2012 as operating expenses 
			rose 24 percent, led by a 40 percent surge in spending on technology 
			and content.
 
 Its shares fell 9.6 percent on Friday, wiping out about $16 billion 
			of value. The company has now fallen short of Wall Street's earnings 
			expectations in seven of the past nine quarters.
 
 Perhaps worse, it predicted an operating loss of up to $810 million 
			for the current third quarter, the biggest quarter-on-quarter 
			reversal in profitability since 2003, B. Riley analysts estimated. 
			Included is $410 million in stock-based compensation in the third 
			quarter, but excluded are "acquisitions, investments, 
			restructurings."
 
 Investors say they are concerned about not only Amazon spending 
			every dollar that comes in the door but also the lack of disclosure 
			about where it is being spent.
 
 "Most companies with the kind of gross revenue Amazon has are not 
			posting these kind of losses," said Michael Yoshikami, CEO of 
			Destination Wealth Management, which sold its stake in Amazon last 
			year. "You've got to give more information to justify faith in the 
			name."
 
 But Amazon has always kept its data close, even basic details such 
			as how many Kindle tablets it has sold or the precise number of 
			subscribers to its Amazon Prime free shipping and media service, 
			citing competitive reasons.
 
 Scanlon said that greater disclosure "would help you do things like 
			measure return on investments. You can start to get your arms around 
			more what the duration of the spending will be."
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
 
			TOUGH TO SWALLOW
 Two areas that have proven hard for some to swallow are a panoply of 
			new devices based on a heavily modified and less-established version 
			of Google's Android, and Amazon's move into program production.
 
 This week, Amazon launched the $649 Fire Phone, but it failed to 
			impress reviewers. The phone joins a Fire streaming box and a line 
			of tablets and e-readers - most sold at prices close to their cost 
			to produce and get to market - in its drive to galvanize sales of 
			digital books and media.
 
 Amazon's foray into TV - from "Alpha House" starring John Goodman to 
			just-announced kids show "Annedroids" - has never garnered 
			Netflix-like acclaim. Yet it intends to devote more than $100 
			million to original video content this quarter.
 
 "There's a lot of stuff they're doing that's questionable," said S&P 
			Capital IQ analyst Tuna Amobi, who has a "sell" rating on Amazon, 
			referring in particular to Amazon's content and hardware endeavors.
 
 Investors might be soothed if Amazon did a share buyback, Scanlon 
			said, adding it was unlikely. While Amazon has more than $5 billion 
			of cash and cash equivalents as of June, analysts say there's little 
			percentage in Amazon buying its own shares, given their lofty 
			valuation even after a slump this year.
 
 Some assessments tag Amazon's shares with a highly-overvalued 
			warning sign.
 
 According to Thomson Reuters StarMine, Amazon’s shares carry an 
			intrinsic worth of $36.37 – or about a tenth of its current price – 
			making the stock one of the most overvalued names in its universe of 
			more than 4,000 U.S. companies. StarMine calculates its intrinsic 
			value figure using growth expectations for the coming decade, and it 
			suggests that at its current price, investors are discounting a much 
			faster growth rate than Amazon could hope to achieve in coming 
			years.
 
			
			 
			
 B. Riley, which downgraded Amazon to neutral from buy on Friday, 
			argued it was hard to justify its valuation given "compromised cash 
			flows."
 
 "There's nothing wrong with spending to diversify your business, but 
			it has to be a focused manner as opposed to throwing spaghetti on 
			the wall and seeing what sticks," Amobi said. "They're a public 
			company, they need some sensitivity" to shareholders.
 
 (Additional reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston and David Gaffen in 
			New York, editing by Edwin Chan and Martin Howell)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 
			2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be 
			published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |