| 
			 U.S. federal investigators are looking into whether Mickelson and 
			Walters may have traded illegally on private information provided by 
			hedge fund manager Icahn, a source familiar with the matter said on 
			Friday. None of the three men has been accused of any wrongdoing, 
			the source said. 
 Icahn's style of investing is to aggressively buy stock with the aim 
			of changing the direction of corporate boards, which makes him an 
			outsider when federal insider trading laws have traditionally 
			focused on corporate insiders, according to legal experts.
 
 The federal probe centers on trades in Clorox Co by Walters and 
			Mickelson as Icahn was making moves to access the company's board in 
			2011, the New York Times reported.
 
 After accumulating a 9.1 percent stake in Clorox, Icahn made a bid 
			valued at more than $10 billion to buy the consumer products 
			company, which sent stock soaring.
 
 Even if Icahn did leak information about his plans regarding Clorox, 
			he may not necessarily have violated the law. Prosecutors would have 
			to show he had breached a fiduciary or confidentiality duty by 
			disclosing material, nonpublic information that was later traded on.
 
			
			 "A true quirk of insider trading rules is that the person who 
			creates the information that's material and confidential has the 
			freedom to use that for themselves and to authorize others to use 
			it," said James Cox, a professor of securities law at Duke 
			University.
 "That’s part of our capitalistic spirit, that people who create the 
			ideas should be able to exploit them,” he said, noting that this 
			could complicate a potential government case.
 
 The regulations also raise the issue of who Icahn would have a duty 
			to in his investing role, said Reed Brodsky, an expert in 
			white-collar crime at Gibson Dunn.
 
 Since Clorox rejected the hostile bid, Icahn would not likely be 
			breaching a duty to the public company's shareholders unless he had 
			entered into some kind of non-disclosure agreement, Brodsky said.
 
 'GRANULAR FACTS'
 
 Roland Riopelle, a former government prosecutor, said Icahn may have 
			had a duty to his own investors to keep certain information 
			confidential. If that duty was breached, the government could argue 
			he violated insider trading laws, he said.
 
 "It could come down to whether (Icahn's fund) had written rules that 
			would prohibit this kind of disclosure or conduct," Riopelle said. 
			"If they didn't have any rules, then (they) are not going to have a 
			case."
 
 "Every case of this kind really comes down to the granular facts," 
			he said.
 
 Icahn sent a letter in July 2011 to Clorox's chairman offering to 
			purchase the company for $76.50 a share and saying he could arrange 
			debt financing for the deal. He later raised the bid to $80.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			If Icahn had launched a formal tender offer, it would have triggered 
			a different standard of disclosure rules under the SEC's 1968 
			Williams Act, said John Coffee, an expert in corporate governance at 
			Columbia Law School.
 Prosecuting Mickelson and Walters would present a different set of 
			challenges, the experts said.
 
 A case against them could hinge on a pending decision expected from 
			the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that could make it harder for 
			the government to prosecute insider trading cases.
 
 Two hedge fund managers brought the appeal in an effort to overturn 
			their insider trading convictions.
 
 The U.S. Supreme Court in 1983 held that the recipient of nonpublic 
			information - a "tippee" - can only be found to have engaged in 
			insider trading if the tipper benefited from the disclosure. The 
			appeals court is being asked to address whether prosecutors must 
			show the tippee knew of the tipper's benefit, which can be financial 
			or non-monetary.
 
 Mickelson and Walters, if they were alleged recipients of inside 
			tips, could be helped by a ruling that toughens the standards for 
			government prosecutors, the experts said.
 
 In response to Friday's news of a federal probe into possible 
			insider trading Icahn told Reuters he was unaware of any 
			investigation and said his firm always followed the law. Mickelson, 
			a Masters champion, said he has done nothing wrong and is 
			cooperating with the investigation. Walters did not respond to 
			requests for comment.
 
 Officials with the FBI and the SEC declined to comment.
 
 (Additional reporting by Nate Raymond and Jennifer Ablan; Editing by 
			Ted Botha and Frances Kerry)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 
			
			 |