New
York City seeks to reinstate large soda ban
Send a link to a friend
[June 05, 2014]
By Daniel Wiessner
ALBANY N.Y.(Reuters) - An
attorney for New York City has asked the state's top
court to revive a ban on large sugary drinks, saying the
city's health department has the power to ban any
products, even hamburgers, that pose a health risk.
|
Lower courts have overturned the ban, which would prohibit some
businesses from selling sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces, because
it was adopted by the health department and not the elected City
Council.
The city on Wednesday got its final chance to have the ban
reinstated at the Court of Appeals in Albany.
Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman asked the city's lawyer, Richard
Dearing, what else could be banned by the health department.
“What if a study said hamburgers are bad and there’s not one good
thing about them?” he asked. “You can ban the triple deckers, all
three patties?”
Dearing responded that the city could indeed ban hamburgers, or at
least cap their size, if it had science on its side.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2014/Jun/05/images/ads/current/best%20friends%20animal%20hospital%20bc062711.png)
The court accepted about a dozen friend-of-the-court briefs in the
high-profile case. The plaintiffs were backed by the NAACP and other
civil rights groups, members of the New York City Council and
business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Two groups of law professors and a coalition representing health
officials from cities across the country were among those who
supported the city.
The soda ban, Dearing said, was based on studies that show sugary
drinks to be a leading driver of obesity.
“The category of (banned) products is based entirely on scientific
evidence,” Dearing said.
[to top of second column] |
![](../images/ads/current/Symphony_122313.png)
Representing the trade groups suing the city was Richard Bress, who
distinguished the ban from other city regulations, such as a
calorie-count requirement or restaurants using trans fats.
“For the very first time, a board has taken it upon itself to
intrude on people’s personal decisions; how much you want to eat,
what you want to eat," said Bress, of the law firm Latham & Watkins.
The case is New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of
Commerce v. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene,
New York State Court of Appeals No. 134.
(Reporting by Daniel Wiessner; Editing by Ted Botha and Gunna
Dickson)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2014/Jun/05/images/ads/current/business_directory_filler.png)
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2014/Jun/05/images/ads/current/cca_laptop-sda021709.png) |