| 
						
						
						 New 
						York City seeks to reinstate large soda ban 
   Send a link to a friend 
						
						[June 05, 2014] 
						By Daniel Wiessner 
						ALBANY N.Y.(Reuters) - An 
						attorney for New York City has asked the state's top 
						court to revive a ban on large sugary drinks, saying the 
						city's health department has the power to ban any 
						products, even hamburgers, that pose a health risk. | 
        
            | 
			 Lower courts have overturned the ban, which would prohibit some 
			businesses from selling sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces, because 
			it was adopted by the health department and not the elected City 
			Council. 
 The city on Wednesday got its final chance to have the ban 
			reinstated at the Court of Appeals in Albany.
 
 Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman asked the city's lawyer, Richard 
			Dearing, what else could be banned by the health department.
 
 “What if a study said hamburgers are bad and there’s not one good 
			thing about them?” he asked. “You can ban the triple deckers, all 
			three patties?”
 
 Dearing responded that the city could indeed ban hamburgers, or at 
			least cap their size, if it had science on its side.
 
			 
			The court accepted about a dozen friend-of-the-court briefs in the 
			high-profile case. The plaintiffs were backed by the NAACP and other 
			civil rights groups, members of the New York City Council and 
			business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
 Two groups of law professors and a coalition representing health 
			officials from cities across the country were among those who 
			supported the city.
 
 The soda ban, Dearing said, was based on studies that show sugary 
			drinks to be a leading driver of obesity.
 
 “The category of (banned) products is based entirely on scientific 
			evidence,” Dearing said.
 
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			Representing the trade groups suing the city was Richard Bress, who 
			distinguished the ban from other city regulations, such as a 
			calorie-count requirement or restaurants using trans fats.
 “For the very first time, a board has taken it upon itself to 
			intrude on people’s personal decisions; how much you want to eat, 
			what you want to eat," said Bress, of the law firm Latham & Watkins.
 
 The case is New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of 
			Commerce v. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 
			New York State Court of Appeals No. 134.
 
 (Reporting by Daniel Wiessner; Editing by Ted Botha and Gunna 
			Dickson)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 
			
			 |