U.S.
corrects Keystone study estimate of rail deaths, other errors
Send a link to a friend
[June 07, 2014]
By Patrick Rucker
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The State
Department on Friday corrected several errors it made in a key study
evaluating the impact of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, including a
understatement of how many people could be killed on railroad tracks if
the project were rejected and oil traffic by rail increased.
|
The department said, however, these corrections had "no impact" on
the integrity of the conclusions of the January report, which played
down potential environmental consequences of TransCanada Corp's
Canada-to-Texas project.
The Obama administration has not yet decided whether to approve the
project.
The January report determined that blocking the controversial
pipeline could increase oil train traffic and lead to an additional
49 injuries and six deaths per year, mostly by using historical
injury and fatality statistics for railways.
That finding was a small element of a broader examination of how
building the pipeline could impact climate change, endangered
species, quality of life and other issues.
But the report mistakenly used a forecast for three months of
expected accidents rather than full-year figures, officials said.
The correct estimate of deaths should be roughly four times as large
- between 18 and 30 fatalities per year.
Officials also revised a footnoted reference to how much electricity
would be needed to power pumping stations along the route of the
pipeline that would link Canada's oil sands region to Texas
refineries.
Running at something less than full capacity, the pumping stations
would not require as much electricity - and so tax power plants less
- than originally reported.
Revising that footnote has no impact on the State Department's
estimation of expected greenhouse gas emissions tied to the
pipeline, a spokesperson said.
[to top of second column] |
"It is common practice to publish an errata sheet that notes and
corrects errors in voluminous technical documents such as
environmental impact statements," the State Department said.
"The Department has reviewed each of the items listed in the errata
sheet and has determined that they have no impact on the integrity
of, or the conclusions reached in, the (final report)."
The State Department also published several dozen public comments
that had not been included in the roughly 2.5 million it received
and previously disclosed.
(Reporting by Patrick Rucker; Editing by Ros Krasny and Will Dunham)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|