|
 The high court left intact lower court rulings that ordered
Argentina to pay $1.33 billion to the so-called holdouts who
refused 2005 and 2010 debt swaps in the wake of its catastrophic
2001-02 default on $100 billion.
This could open the door to claims from other holdouts worth as
much as $15 billion, a hefty sum for a slowing economy
struggling with rapidly dwindling foreign reserves.
The news triggered a nosedive in Argentine stocks and bonds
after investors expected the court to delay its decision and
give Argentina time to negotiate with holdouts or restructure
its exchange bonds outside of New York legislation.
The impact on global markets was muted given the country's
economic isolation since its default.
Argentina has previously refused to pay up. It argues it does
not have the funds and cannot give holdouts preferential
treatment over exchange bondholders after many of them bought
the debt at a massive discount and are claiming payback in full.
If it sticks to that position, U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa
could prevent full payment to exchange bondholders even though
the country is able and willing to pay them.
This could result in a default by June 30, when payments are due
on discount bonds governed by New York, further setting back
Argentina's return to international capital markets.
"It's a very damaging scenario for Argentina," said Marco
Lavagna at Ecolatina consultancy, noting that how lower courts
implemented their rulings was key. "Maybe something could open
up there and allow for negotiation.
Argentina hinted last month it might consider negotiating with
holdouts but could not do so until December 31 of this year when
a clause in its debt swaps prohibiting it from offering holdouts
better terms expires.
Whether Argentina can keep stalling investors and U.S. courts
until that date remains to be seen.
Argentine stocks .MERV were down 7.3 percent by 1730 GMT, while
the U.S. dollar-denominated benchmark 2033 Discount bonds
ARGGLB33=RR fell 7.86 points in price to bid 75.010. Siobhan
Morden, New York-based head of Latin American strategy at
Jefferies LLC, said the market reaction was relatively mild as
investors waited to see how the government would respond.
The government was not immediately available for comment on
Monday but state-run news agency Telam said President Cristina
Fernandez would deliver a televised address on Monday night.
The decision comes at an unfortunate time for Argentina which
has been trying to normalize relations with foreign investors
and creditors in order to regain access to international funds.
A DOUBLE BLOW
Argentina wants to avoid making full payment to holdouts led by
hedge funds Aurelius Capital Management and NML Capital Ltd, a
unit of billionaire Paul Singer's Elliott Management Corp, that
Fernandez has slated as "vultures".
[to top of second column] |
Creditors holding about 93 percent of Argentina's bonds agreed to
participate in the two debt swaps in 2005 and 2010, accepting
between 25 and 29 cents on the dollar.
Some groups such as the IMF, the Washington-based global lender,
have said they are worried a ruling against Argentina will make it
more difficult for other countries to restructure their debt and put
financial calamity behind them.
"This is surprising because it is giving a precedent for any
'vulture fund' to go against any country, so any country is
vulnerable in a restructure," said Sebastian Centurion at ABC
Exchange.
Others say collective action clauses that are now broadly used now
in sovereign debt issuance should prevent Argentina's particular
case becoming a precedent. Emerging markets did not react to the
news of the Supreme Court decision.
In a double blow to Argentina on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court also
ruled that creditors can seek information about Argentina's non-U.S.
assets in a case about bank subpoenas that is part of the country's
decade-long litigation with holdouts.
The question was whether NML could enforce subpoenas against Bank of
America and Banco de la Nacion Argentina. The court's ruling may
nonetheless have limited impact in part because of Argentina's
limited assets around the world.
NML has in the past pursued Argentine assets aggressively in its
fight to get full repayment for its bonds, in 2012 even seizing an
Argentine navy ship in Ghana.
On the issue of paying bondholders, Argentina had said in its most
recent court filing that the government would struggle to pay the
bondholders in full while also serving its restructured debt.
In that scenario, "Argentina will have to face, objectively, a
serious and imminent risk of default," the filing said.
The bondholders dispute that assessment, saying in their own court
filing there was evidence presented in lower courts that Argentina
could afford to pay.
"We are reviewing the decisions from the Supreme Court today and
what the next steps might be, but we have no other comment at this
time," a spokesman for NML told Reuters.
(Additional reporting by Daniel Bases in New York and the Buenos
Aires bureau; Editing by Howard Goller, Kieran Murray and Andrew
Hay)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
