|
 Uruguay FA president Wilmar Valdez told reporters in Rio de
Janeiro that FIFA's disciplinary committee had not reached a
decision on the case at a meeting on Wednesday and would continue
deliberations on Thursday.
The incident in Uruguay's 1-0 victory over Italy in Natal on Tuesday
has brought the ugly side of the game to the fore, marring a
tournament that has been widely praised for its attacking football
and major upsets.
Suarez's lawyer, Alejandro Balbi, flew to Rio de Janeiro with
Uruguay FA chief Wilmar Valdez to lay out the player's defense,
although the consensus among those who have seen replays of the
incident is that the forward's future at the tournament is in
serious jeopardy.
The disciplinary committee must rule on whether or not Suarez is
guilty. Uruguay has up to four more games to play in Brazil, and any
ban would probably rule the player out of the finals.
Balbi, Suarez's team and the Uruguayan public generally believe that
the forward has been unfairly singled out in what they call a
"manhunt" against a player whose chequered career has seen him
banned twice before for biting.
"We don't have any doubts that this has happened because it's Suarez
and secondly because Italy was eliminated," said Balbi, who is also
a Uruguay FA board member, before he left for Brazil. "There's a lot
of pressure from England and Italy."
Uruguay defender Diego Lugano said the incident had been blown out
of proportion, and that other potentially more dangerous fouls had
been committed in other games.
"Football's like that," he told reporters.
"It's passion, it's contact, and you should have a bit more balance
and justice when talking about different incidents, because if not
it looks like you only want to take aim at one player or team and it
seems on purpose."
The incident in question came 10 minutes from time in Uruguay's
Group D game against Italy, when television footage showed Suarez's
mouth come down on the shoulder of Italian defender Giorgio
Chiellini, who has accused him of biting.
The Italians were still complaining when Uruguay's Diego Godin
scored with an 81st-minute header to secure a win that sent the
South Americans through to the last 16 and eliminated four-times
champions Italy from the tournament.
MAXIMUM BAN TWO YEARS
Chiellini pulled down his shirt, and Reuters photographs showed what
looked like bite marks on his shoulder.
Suarez has denied biting.
"Those are situations that happen on the pitch. We were both just
there inside the area. He shoved me with his shoulder, and my eye
got left like that also," he said on Tuesday, in reference to
Chiellini's marks.
Balbi was asked by Reuters in Rio whether the contact was
intentional.
 "No," he replied. "Suarez's mouth hit against the Italian player's
shoulder."
Valdez added: "If FIFA acts the way that it should, being objective,
according to the proof that there is, he really should not be
sanctioned ... Luis is a football player that is important to the
whole world, not just Uruguay."
The referee did not spot the incident during the match, but FIFA's
rules allow the use of video or "any other evidence" to punish
players retrospectively.
FIFA's disciplinary code sets a maximum ban of 24 matches or two
years, but the longest suspension FIFA has imposed for an offence at
a World Cup was eight games on Italy's Mauro Tassotti for breaking
the nose of Spain's Luis Enrique in 1994.
FIFA said it would work quickly to investigate the incident, with
Uruguay due to play Colombia on Saturday in Rio in the first
knockout round.
[to top of second column] |
"The Disciplinary Committee understands the urgency of the
matter," FIFA spokeswoman Delia Fischer told reporters.
Brazil's sports minister Aldo Rebelo said the incident was
"regrettable" for its potential impact on the World Cup. "I think
it's very bad that it happened," he told reporters. "He (Suarez) is
an exceptional player, helps to give the World Cup more attention
... That was not the first bite. Other ones have happened."
HUGE BLOW
Losing Suarez would be a huge blow to Uruguay, who rely heavily on
the prolific Liverpool forward's attacking talent. He scored both
goals in the side's 2-1 win over England earlier in the tournament,
and is widely considered the team's best player.
Whatever the outcome of FIFA's investigation, the biting scandal
could have a major impact on the player's career, just as he
appeared to have put past misdemeanors behind him and focused on the
football.
His Liverpool side finished second in the English Premier League
last season, thanks in no small part to Suarez's brilliance in front
of goal that earned him the Professional Footballers' Association
(PFA) Player of the Year award.
But PFA chief Gordon Taylor said he now feared for Suarez's future.
"He seemed to get back on track," Taylor told the BBC. "He had a
great season... It is a big problem for Liverpool," he added. "I
fear for his career."
 Suarez was banned for 10 games last year after biting Chelsea's
Branislav Ivanovic in a Premier League game and in 2010 was
suspended for seven games for a similar offence against PSV
Eindhoven's Otman Bakkal while playing for Ajax Amsterdam.
He also missed Uruguay's World Cup semi-final against the
Netherlands four years ago after being sent off for a handball on
the line that denied Ghana what would have been a match-winning goal
in the final minute of extra time.
Suarez risks losing lucrative commercial deals.
Poker brand 888 said it was "seriously reviewing" its sponsorship
agreement with him after Suarez became one of the online gambling
company's brand ambassadors last month.
Suarez has an endorsement deal with German sportswear company
Adidas, which said it was awaiting FIFA's decision before taking any
action, and he has also been advertising the Beats headphones worn
by many top players.
(Additional reporting by Malena Castaldi in Montevideo, Alexandra
Ulmer in Buenos Aires, Keith Weir in Curitiba and David Ljunggren in
Manaus; Writing by Mike Collett-White; editing by Justin Palmer and
Ken Ferris)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
