| 
 
            
			 In a Friday court filing, BP asked U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier 
			in New Orleans to require businesses to make restitution plus 
			interest of excess payments, which it called "windfalls." It also 
			requested an injunction to stop the businesses from spending these 
			excess sums. 
			 
			BP said letting the overpayments stand would create discrepancies 
			that reward some businesses whose awards were made sooner. It also 
			said "there is no public interest in permitting dissipation of 
			assets to which claimants had no right." 
			 
			Friday's request escalates BP's legal battle over how to interpret 
			its 2012 settlement to resolve claims by businesses who said they 
			suffered economic losses because of the spill. 
			 
			BP has long said the businesses' lawyers and claims administrator 
			Patrick Juneau have misinterpreted the settlement, allowing 
			recoveries without proof that the spill caused losses. 
			  
              
			 
			The London-based oil company has said the uncapped settlement could 
			cost $9.2 billion, higher than its original $7.8 billion estimate, 
			and that this amount could grow. 
			 
			On June 9, the U.S. Supreme Court said BP must continue to pay 
			claims as it pursues legal challenges to the payouts. 
			 
			Friday's filing came six months Barbier directed Juneau to change 
			his policy in reviewing claims applications, and ensure that 
			claimants be able to "match" revenues with costs for the purpose of 
			calculating financial losses. 
			 
			BP said Juneau's new policy, which won court approval on May 5, will 
			lead to "dramatically different calculations of lost profits," and 
			justifies recouping earlier, inflated awards. 
			 
			To illustrate the potential changes, BP said a seller of animal 
			skins would have under the new policy been paid $14 million less 
			than it was awarded, while a construction company located hundreds 
			of miles from the Gulf would have been paid $8.4 million less. 
			 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
			Juneau's earlier interpretation "resulted in claimants receiving 
			awards well in excess of what they are entitled to under the 
			settlement agreement - in some cases by millions of dollars - or 
			awards that weren't warranted at all," BP spokesman Geoff Morrell 
			said. "Letting these erroneous awards stand uncorrected would 
			violate basic principles of fairness and equity." 
			 
			Steve Herman and Jim Roy, the lead lawyers for business claimants, 
			said in a statement: "This is just another attempt by BP to back out 
			of the commitment it made to the Gulf." 
			 
			A spokesman for Juneau did not immediately respond to a request for 
			comment. 
			 
			The April 20, 2010 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig 
			and rupture of BP's Macondo oil well led to 11 deaths and the 
			largest U.S. offshore oil spill. BP has said it has taken $42.7 
			billion of pretax charges for the spill. 
			 
			The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in 
			the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Eastern 
			District of Louisiana, No. 10-md-02179. 
			 
			(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Bernard Orr) 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 
			2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be 
			published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			   |