| The kicker: Nearly 1 in 5 American adults — roughly 34 million 
			people — engage in at least seven of them. These eye-opening 
			findings are pooled from detailed surveys of more than 11,000 adults 
			across the U.S., comparing the online actions, behaviors and life 
			experiences of fraud victims and non-victims — and providing a 
			detailed "profile" of those who are most vulnerable to 
			Internet-based scams. Behaviors In the past seven days before being surveyed, respondents 
			admitted to:Opened by 26 percent of victims, compared 
				with 10 percent of non-victims, pop-ups are often used to 
				install computer malware or lead to surveys that glean personal 
				information. Opening email from 
				unknown sources:27 percent of victims versus 17 percent of 
				non-victims risked similar malware and detail-seeking phishing 
				in emails. Downloading apps:39 percent versus 28 percent. Yet another method used to install 
				malware to steal computer files, passwords and accounts. 
			
			 
				
				
				23 percent versus 7 percent. 
				Scammers pose as buyers, paying with counterfeit checks or money 
				orders — often for higher amounts than the sale price, with a 
				request to send back the difference.Selling products 
				on online auction sites:
				47 percent versus 
				30 percent. When using these services, link them to a credit 
				card, which offers more protection against fraud. There's more 
				risk linking to a checking or debit card account, because if 
				those systems are hacked, or someone gets your payment transfer 
				information, your bank account is exposed to the scammer.Purchasing a 
				product through a money payment business:
				18 percent versus 8 percent engaged in these traps, which lock 
				buyers into hard-to-cancel contracts — and merchandise may not 
				arrive until after the trial ends.Signing up for "free trial" offers: Additionally, victims scored higher on several indicators of 
			acting impulsively and admitted to posting more personal 
			information online, such as birth dates, marital status, names of 
			children and even Social Security numbers, that could be used for 
			identity theft. They were also more likely to visit websites that 
			required them to read privacy and terms of agreement statements 
			— significant because those sites often require providing personal 
			information. [to top of second 
			column] | 
 Life experiences Confirming previous research, the AARP report found that feeling 
			vulnerable increases fraud vulnerability. So be extra careful when 
			making decisions online (or in person). And take note, friends and 
			family members, if loved ones are experiencing any of the following:reported by 2 in 3 victims, compared with a 
				minority of non-victims. Loss of a job:23 percent versus 10 percent. Negative change in 
				financial status: 44 percent versus 23 percent. Being concerned about debt: 69 
				percent versus 57 percent. Other factors that increase vulnerability risk: stress about 
			moving, personal or family illness, the death of a loved one, 
			relationship issues, and going through a divorce (which tripled the 
			risk). Previous research shows that those 65 and older are most 
			vulnerable to any type of scam within three years of such traumatic 
			events. 
				
			 Knowledge When asked several questions about Internet safety, neither 
			victims nor non-victims scored particularly well. But on two 
			specific issues, victims were significantly less likely to answer 
			correctly than non-victims:Nearly 2 in 
				3 victims, compared with 38 percent of non-victims, believe that 
				banks do this, but it's a common ruse by scammers to download 
				malware or collect details for likely identity theft. Being unaware that a website's privacy 
				policy does not mean the site will not share information from 
				users.Roughly half of non-victims, compared with 40 percent 
				of victims, were aware that information can be shared. However, 
				such information may be sold either to legitimate vendors or to 
				scammers posing as such, and used to compile "sucker lists" to 
				identify possible future victims. 
			
			[Text from 
			AARP 
			Blog via
			
			AgeOptions] |