|
 After testing 17 different lamps in nail salons,
researchers calculated that it would take between eight and 208
visits — depending on the machine — to damage skin cells in a way
that raises cancer risk.
"I wouldn't tell a patient to stop going unless they were going
multiple times a month," lead author Dr. Lyndsay Shipp from Georgia
Regents University in Augusta told Reuters Health.
Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a risk factor for most
skin cancers, according to the American Cancer Society. Natural
sunlight and UV lamps used for tanning give off the harmful rays, as
do the small lamps used to speed drying in nail salons.
Previous studies have looked at the polish-drying UV lamps and
suggested the rays may be powerful enough to cause damage, Shipp's
team notes in JAMA Dermatology, but those studies had flaws.
"They didn't actually go out and measure the nail lamps themselves
and measure the UV radiation they're exposed to," Shipp said.
For the new study, the researchers measured the UV-A rays produced
by 17 different nail polish drying devices at 16 salons.
UV-A is one of three types of UV ray. It ages the skin to cause
wrinkles and breaks DNA strands within skin cells, which can lead to
cancer.
The lamps tested by the researchers differed in their power levels,
but generally UV lamps with higher wattages put out higher levels of
UV-A radiation.
Based on a calculation of how much UV-A radiation exposure is needed
to damage DNA, the researchers found that it would take — on average — 11 uses for the devices to deliver enough UV-A to raise cancer
risk.
They estimated that hands would be in the device for about eight
minutes per manicure, and the risky total exposure times ranged from
eight minutes to 208 minutes, depending on the machine.
Although the risk is low, Shipp's team endorsed the idea of wearing
sunscreen to protect hands from UV damage.
[to top of second column] |
Dr. Alina Markova, who was not involved in the new study, told
Reuters Health it's also important to note that DNA damage doesn't
mean the person will develop cancer.
"Just one risk factor of DNA damage doesn't mean you'll have a
clinical outcome of skin cancer or photoaging," she said.
Markova, who works within the Boston University Department of
Dermatology, has studied the UV rays put off by nail salon lamps.
"While we're starting to realize these UV nail lamps are relatively
safe, we still need to realize that the artificial UV devices that
are hazardous are tanning beds," she said.
The World Health Organization (WHO), the American Medical
Association and the American Academy of Dermatology have come out
against indoor tanning in recent years.
In 2009, WHO labeled tanning devices as high-level carcinogens,
which puts tanning on par with tobacco use as a public health
threat.
Shipp said doctors can't say anything is perfectly safe, but nail
salon lamps seem relatively safe.
"Personally, I won't stop getting manicures myself," she said.
__
Source: http://bit.ly/WjBo5P
JAMA
Dermatology, online April 30, 2014.
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
