Progressive news
By Jim Killebrew
Send a link to a friend
[May 08, 2014]
There
is a lot of talk these days about the “progressive” or “liberal”
journalism seeming to miss the news that puts a negative slant on
some particular position the specific journalist may hold. This
seems especially true for those journalists who have moved into the
media of radio or broadcast news anchors. Even though many
newspapers and magazine reporters fall within the “liberal”
parameter, there are also charges against the “conservative” bias as
well. Of course the “commentators” express personal biases because
their perception of the “news” is more an analysis of the news,
thereby constituting more opinion than fact. |
Some of the more famous conservative commentators like Rush Limbaugh, Glen
Beck, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Monica Crowley and Mark
Levin have been maligned by the liberal crowd as these commentators present
the conservative perspective in contrast to the policies, perspectives and
actions of the political “leftists.” Everyone can accept and even expect the
counterpoint perspective from these conservative commentators. But where are
the “journalists” who appear on the network and cable “news” programs
standing in deference to these commentators from within their training and
experience to be journalists?
The educational requirements of the typical journalist are not unlike the
preparation of any other field of study. Most professional careers are
filled with people who started with a general education in their early
college experience. Basic “liberal arts” and “lower divisional requirements”
must be passed as the individual move along to a specialty requiring more
focused learning. While seeking at least a bachelor’s degree with a major in
journalism the would-be journalist will seek a concentration in some other
related study that will enhance their skills in their job.
It goes without saying that experience is needed for the top jobs in media
journalism. One way to get the experience is to complete an internship. I
wonder in today’s world on the liberal side of journalism if the internist
emulates the liberal anchor person who is in the tank for a politician so
deeply he reports that he gets a tingle going up his leg every time he hears
his favorite politician talk. Is that now the standard of professionalism
and experience that educational institutions offering training in journalism
require a built-in course or internship on learning bias and rejection of
real news?
[to top of second column] |
At the end of the journalist learning
experience we expect certain abilities to have been learned. We
generally think a good journalist will be like the lady of
jurisprudence, holding the scales while wearing a blindfold. We like
to think the journalist does not practice bias in a way that directs
the news and colors it more from a perspective of being a
cheerleader for their favored personal issues than presenting it in
a “fair and balanced” way. For sure the American public who believes
in the freedom of the press and freedom of speech wants more than
mere opinion from a bunch of talking heads masquerading as news
anchors pretending to practice objectivity while claiming to be
credible.
One only has to look at the various issues that have raised the
American citizen’s interest level during the past few years to
understand the American “progressive” or liberal media have not
offered up a “fair and balanced” representation of the actual news.
At the same time, however, they have often ridiculed and maligned
their conservative counterparts who have made efforts to present a
“fair and balanced” perspective in reporting the news.
[By JIM KILLEBREW]
Click here to respond to the editor about this
article.
|