| 
		
		
		 Comcast 
		To Face Trio Of Critics At Congressional Merger Hearing 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		[May 08, 2014] 
		By Diane Bartz
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Comcast's plan to 
		merge with Time Warner Cable Inc is expected to face criticism from an 
		independent network, small and medium-sized cable operators and a former 
		Internet partner when U.S. lawmakers meet on Thursday for a second time 
		to discuss the controversial deal.
 | 
			
            | 
			 The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee's antitrust panel 
			will hear from Comcast Corp Executive Vice President David Cohen. 
 The company argues its proposed $45 billion deal to merge the No. 1 
			and No. 2 U.S. cable operators would not hurt consumers since the 
			companies overlap geographically in very few places.
 
 Among the critics due to testify is Dave Schaeffer, CEO of Cogent 
			Communications Group Inc, which has been a high-speed go-between for 
			Netflix and Comcast. In February, Netflix Inc agreed to pay Comcast 
			an unknown sum to connect directly.
 
 Shaeffer said in prepared testimony that, after years of free 
			connections "Comcast demanded that Cogent enter into a commercial 
			relationship" to remedy Netflix's balky speed.
 
 
			 Shaeffer said Cogent offered to pay for some hardware costs, but 
			that Comcast had remained silent.
 In Comcast's prepared testimony, Cohen argued that Netflix chose the 
			option of a direct connection and that such deals are neither novel 
			nor unusual.
 
 Netflix has been critical of the agreement it made, with one 
			executive calling it "double-dipping" since Comcast customers and 
			Netflix both pay to have the movies and television shows delivered 
			to living rooms.
 
 A second critic of the merger to testify will be Patrick Gottsch, 
			founder of Rural Media Group, whose RFD-TV channel provides programs 
			aimed at farmers and about rural living.
 
 Gottsch complained that, after Comcast bought NBC Universal in 2011, 
			it dropped some television channels.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			"Because there is no clear business reason to understand Comcast's 
			decision, we can only speculate that RFD-TV has become competitive 
			with Comcast's affiliated programming," Gottsch wrote in his 
			testimony.
 The American Cable Association's Matthew Polka also worried about 
			video programming and urged the Justice Department and Federal 
			Communications Commission, which must review the deal, to ensure 
			Comcast does not raise prices or withhold shows from smaller rivals.
 
 Comcast said on April 28 that it was willing to divest nearly four 
			million subscribers to win approval for the deal. That will leave 
			Comcast with 29 million subscribers if the deal goes through.
 
 The deal was reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 9.
 
 (Reporting by Diane Bartz. Editing by Ros Krasny and Andre Grenon)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |