N.Y.
Times Publisher Denies Fired Female Editor Was Paid Less
Send a link to a friend
[May 20, 2014]
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Days after the
sudden termination of Jill Abramson as executive editor of The New York
Times, the first woman to hold that position, the newspaper's publisher
denied reports that she had been paid less than her predecessor.
|
"There is no truth to the charge," Arthur Sulzberger Jr. told
Vanity Fair in a May 18 interview for a story published on Tuesday
on the magazine's website.
"A lot of what's out there is untrue," Vanity Fair quoted Sulzberger
as saying in what it billed as his first interview since the May 14
announcement of Abramson's ouster, which sparked a firestorm of
commentary on women managers in the workplace.
Sulzberger, who appointed Abramson to the job in 2011, said that her
position on the Times' executive committee had increased her bonus
significantly, which according to the Times boosted her overall
compensation more than 10 percent higher than that of her
predecessor, Bill Keller, in his last year.
Vanity Fair said Abramson declined to comment on Sulzberger's
statements to the magazine.
But it said a former Times executive recalled that Abramson had
raised objections to her compensation when she took the job and felt
there was a discrepancy when compared with Keller's salary, hiring a
lawyer to discuss her compensation.
[to top of second column] |
Sulzberger appointed Dean Baquet, Abramson's deputy, as her
successor, some three years after choosing Abramson over Baquet for
the newspaper's top editorial job.
Asked if he would have made a different decision if he knew then
what he knows now, the magazine quoted him as having said "Of course
I would have done it differently."
(Reporting by Chris Michaud; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|