| 
						
						
						 Apple, 
						Google, Intel, Adobe To Pay $325 Million To Settle 
						Hiring Lawsuit 
   Send a link to a friend 
						
						[May 24, 2014] 
						By Jonathan Stempel
 (Reuters) - Four major 
						Silicon Valley companies have formally agreed to pay 
						$324.5 million to settle claims brought by employees who 
						accused them of limiting competition by colluding not to 
						poach each other's talent.
 | 
        
            | 
            
			 The settlement, between Apple Inc, Google Inc, Intel Corp, Adobe 
			Systems Inc and roughly 64,000 workers, was disclosed in papers 
			filed late on Thursday with a federal court in San Jose, California. 
 U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh has been asked to preliminarily approve 
			the accord at a June 19 hearing, over an objection by one of the 
			four named plaintiffs, Michael Devine, who says the settlement let 
			the companies off too easily.
 
 The payout was originally reported by Reuters but not officially 
			confirmed.
 
 Lawyers for the plaintiffs may seek up to 25 percent of the 
			settlement amount in legal fees.
 
 Filed in 2011, the lawsuit accused Silicon Valley companies of 
			conspiring to limit competition and keep wages down for engineers, 
			programmers and other technical staff.
 
 
             
			The case has been closely watched because of the potential $9 
			billion of damages sought, and its occasional embarrassing 
			revelations into how Silicon Valley operates.
 
 Among the communications that became public were pointed emails from 
			Apple co-founder Steve Jobs that at times admonished then-Google 
			Chief Executive Eric Schmidt to stop raiding his company.
 
 Thursday's settlement gives workers only a few thousand dollars each 
			on average.
 
 The companies' combined profit in their latest fiscal years was 
			about $60 billion, with three-fifths coming from Apple.
 
 In court papers, two law firms representing the plaintiffs said 
			Devine's objection should not doom what they consider a fair and 
			reasonable settlement for an antitrust case, and which serves the 
			best interests of the class.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
 
			They pointed to a July 2012 jury verdict in the same court that 
			found Toshiba Corp conspired to fix prices in the liquid crystal 
			display market but awarded just $87 million of damages, one-tenth of 
			what was sought.
 "The amount of the settlement does not relate to the size or 
			profitability of the companies we sued," Joseph Saveri, a lawyer for 
			the plaintiffs, said in an interview. "It relates to the claims we 
			made, the law that applies to them, and the facts that we could 
			prove at trial. Based on that, I think the settlement is a 
			significant achievement."
 
 Devine did not immediately respond on Friday to a request for 
			comment.
 
 Koh on May 16 approved separate settlements totaling $20 million 
			over alleged poaching by Walt Disney Co's Lucasfilm and Pixar units, 
			and by Intuit Inc.
 
 The case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California is 
			In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, 11-02509.
 
 (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in Toronto; Additional reporting by 
			Dan Levine in San Francisco; Editing by Paul Simao)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |