| 
             Mester, a Fed veteran of nearly three decades, becomes president of 
			the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland on Sunday after stepping down 
			as head of research at the central bank's Philadelphia branch. 
 A review of her past research and interviews with colleagues leave 
			several questions on monetary policy unanswered. They show, however, 
			that she has not clearly staked out positions alongside that of 
			Charles Plosser, her boss at the Philadelphia Fed who has long 
			criticized the central bank's aggressive crisis-era stimulus.
 
 Mester, 55, has published papers on inflation and too-big-to-fail 
			banks that could run against the grain at the central bank, the 
			review shows. Her deep body of research into financial 
			intermediation, meanwhile, could make hers a leading voice as 
			policymakers debate how to drain trillions of dollars in Wall Street 
			reserves in the years ahead.
 
 Yet a relative dearth of published views on monetary policy has left 
			many investors and economists guessing how she will vote at a 
			central bank meeting on June 17-18.
 
 
             
			"Her association with Philadelphia immediately raised assumptions 
			she was hawkish, but I don't think that's a good reading," said Dana 
			Saporta, a New York-based economist at Credit Suisse. "Her record 
			really doesn't give a clear signal so for now we are marking her up 
			as 'neutral'."
 
 Americans will get their first real introduction to Mester on Friday 
			when she discusses inflation in a speech to close a two-day 
			conference at the Cleveland Fed. She has been in and out of the bank 
			since being named to the post Feb. 13, when she was introduced to 
			employees in the building's top-floor auditorium, with its view of 
			Lake Erie.
 
 Mester, who replaces long-time centrist Sandra Pianalto, will have a 
			vote on the Fed's policy committee every other year, a historical 
			benefit granted to the heads of the Cleveland and Chicago Fed banks. 
			Other regional presidents vote every third year except for the head 
			of the New York Fed, who votes every year.
 
 Interviews show she is well known and respected within the central 
			bank as one of its longest-serving research directors and as a 
			regular at policy meetings in Washington, where she served a short 
			stint in the Fed's powerful monetary affairs division.
 
 Economists who regularly visit Philadelphia to discuss policy have 
			left with the impression that Mester, while on the hawkish side of 
			the spectrum, is not as ideologically opposed to the Fed's 
			aggressive accommodation as is Plosser, who has strongly dissented 
			against decisions in recent years to ramp up bond purchases and to 
			promise low rates for a long time.
 
 "She seems to be someone who relies on evidence, not gut feeling, so 
			I'd expect her to set her own path on policy," said Donald Kohn, a 
			former Fed vice chair who is now a senior fellow at Brookings 
			Institution, a think tank.
 
 The central bank is only now ramping down these purchases, given 
			unemployment is down to 6.3 percent from a recessionary high of 10 
			percent. It will likely start to raise interest rates some time next 
			year, though the timing will hinge on whether inflation firms and on 
			any threats of asset-price bubbles.
 
 
            
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			In a 2009 speech that foreshadowed a debate that is now growing 
			louder, Mester said central bankers at times needed to use rate 
			hikes to pre-empt asset price bubbles. 
			"When there are a sufficient number of signs that financial 
			imbalances are building up, (such as) significant increases in asset 
			prices, credit growth, and leverage, policymakers should consider 
			using monetary policy even if these imbalances have not yet affected 
			current measures of inflation and output," she said at the time.
 Jeremy Stein, who retired just this week as a Fed governor, has been 
			pushing the idea the central bank should stand ready to raise rates 
			to head off risky asset bubbles in the future, a stance that Fed 
			Chair Janet Yellen has partly embraced.
 
 Mester has also written that measures of so-called core inflation - 
			a favorite of many Fed policymakers because it ignores volatile 
			commodity prices - is not necessarily the best predictor of total 
			inflation.
 
 
			Since earning her doctorate in economics from Princeton University, 
			Mester's resume has grown long.
 She is a founding member or adviser of at least three organizations 
			focused on finance, and has scholarly papers published on an array 
			of topics like credit card lending, the structure of central banks 
			and the consolidation of private banks.
 
 Such financial expertise could be vital when the central bank starts 
			to raise rates and shrink its $4.3-trillion balance sheet. It could 
			also help with supervising Wall Street banks.
 
 "Loretta is an economist who is an original and independent 
			thinker," said Joseph Hughes, an economics professor at Rutgers 
			University, citing findings he and Mester published on the cost 
			advantages that big banks enjoy above and beyond any investor 
			perceptions that the government would bail them out if needed.
 
 
			 
			"I would expect Loretta to bring an important perspective to central 
			banking involving issues of supervision and regulation," added 
			Hughes, who has co-authored several papers with Mester since 1993.
 
 (Reporting by Jonathan Spicer; Editing by David Chance and Chizu 
			Nomiyama)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |