| 
		
		
		 North 
		Carolina Lawmakers Adopt Tax On Electronic Cigarettes 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		[May 30, 2014] 
		By Marti Maguire
 RALEIGH N.C. (Reuters) - North Carolina, 
		the top U.S. tobacco-producing state, will levy a modest tax on 
		increasingly popular electronic cigarettes as part of legislation 
		adopted by state lawmakers and signed by the governor on Thursday.
 | 
			
            | 
			 Republican Governor Pat McCrory signed a measure that adds a tax 
			of 5 cents to each milliliter of the nicotine liquid that 
			e-cigarettes use. Smokers inhale through a battery-powered metal 
			tube, turning the liquid to vapor. 
 The tax was cleared by the state Senate and House in bipartisan 
			votes earlier on Thursday.
 
 Sales of e-cigarettes have grown dramatically and are expected to 
			surpass traditional cigarette sales within a decade, yet they remain 
			largely unregulated. Several states have considered taxing them at a 
			rate much higher than 5 cents, on a level that is similar to 
			traditional cigarettes. So far, only Minnesota has adopted such a 
			tax.
 
 North Carolina taxes traditional cigarettes at 45 cents per pack.
 
 Large tobacco companies including Reynolds American Inc, which is 
			based in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, supported the 5-cent tax as 
			they seek to replace the declining market for traditional 
			cigarettes.
 
			 
			The measure's supporters highlighted what they claimed are the 
			health benefits of e-cigarettes.
 
 “Tobacco and vapor products have vastly differing health impacts, 
			manufacturing processes and business models,” Representative Ruth 
			Samuelson, a sponsor of the bill, said in an email on Thursday. “In 
			light of this, we must ... draw a clear distinction between how 
			North Carolina treats tobacco products and vapor products.”
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			Opposition to the tax has come from both Democrats and Republicans.
 Some Democrats argued that e-cigarettes should be taxed at a higher 
			rate, or that the state should wait to decide how to tax them until 
			the U.S. Food and Drug Administration unveils regulations on 
			e-cigarettes that are expected this summer.
 
 Others said there should be no tax at all on a product that has been 
			touted as a less harmful alternative to regular cigarettes.
 
 “It makes little sense in this fragile economy to impose higher 
			taxes on a product that provides consumers a viable and harmless 
			alternative to traditional tobacco products,” Grover Norquist, 
			president of Americans for Tax Reform, wrote in a letter to state 
			legislators.
 
 (Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Matthew Lewis)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |