News...
                        sponsored by

St. Louis police deny no-fly zone during protests aimed at media

Send a link to a friend  Share

[November 04, 2014]  By Kenny Bahr
 
 CLAYTON Mo. (Reuters) - St. Louis County police defended on Monday a no-fly zone imposed over the suburb of Ferguson during August street protests, saying it was for safety reasons, after an Associated Press report said the prohibition was to keep news helicopters away.

Police have been criticized for using rubber bullets, tear gas and dogs and for pointing weapons at protesters during demonstrations that followed the Aug. 9 shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown by white Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson.

"It's always all about safety. That's the bottom line on this," St. Louis County Chief of Police Jon Belmar told a news conference about the no-fly zone.

He said the decision was made after pilots reported seeing muzzle flashes and potentially hazardous lasers pointed at them.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) imposed flight restrictions in 37 square miles of airspace for 12 days. Air traffic managers struggled to redefine the ban to let commercial flights operate at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport and allow police helicopters but ban other traffic in the area, the AP reported on Sunday.

"They finally admitted it really was to keep the media out," said one FAA manager about the St. Louis County Police in a series of recorded telephone conversations obtained by the AP through a U.S. Freedom of Information Act request.

The AP reported that a manager at the FAA's Kansas City center said police "did not care if you ran commercial traffic through this TFR (temporary flight restriction) all day long. They didn't want media in there."

Belmar denied that police had discussed banning media flights. "We didn't have this type of discussion in the unified command. This never came up," he said.

He said the FAA decided what flights and altitudes would be allowed.

The FAA said in a statement on Monday it would "err on the side of safety," when local law enforcement reported potential threats to aircraft. It said it could not specifically exclude media from entering air space.

[to top of second column]

"FAA cannot and will never exclusively ban media from covering an event of national significance and media was never banned from covering the ongoing events in Ferguson in this case," the FAA said.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who called for "wholesale" change at the Ferguson Police Department last week, said on Monday he was not aware whether the Justice Department was involved in the request for a no-fly zone and condemned the use of such practices to block media access.

"Anything that would officially inhibit the ability of news gatherers to do what they do, I think, needs to be avoided," Holder said at a news conference on an unrelated topic.

(Additional reporting by Mary Wisniewski in Chicago and Julia Edwards in Washington; Writing by Fiona Ortiz; Editing by Carey Gillam, Susan Heavey and Jim Loney)

[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]

Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

< Top Stories index

Back to top