|
 Ebola has not yet forced ports to close, but uncertainties about the
spread of the virus are adding to legal and financial concerns for
those involved in shipping oil, cocoa and minerals from the region.
Iron ore miners have already been hit by logistics problems
exacerbated by the Ebola outbreak.
"Ebola clauses have now become a very common phenomenon," said a
senior freight manager with a leading commodities trader. "It is to
protect the safety of the crew and also the earnings of owners."
Shipping lines active in West Africa, such as oil tanker firm Stena
Weco, have written clauses into their contracts requiring charterers
to nominate alternative safe discharge ports if Ebola means they
cannot call at the intended port, according to a contract seen by
Reuters.
Global trade house Trafigura [TRAFGF.UL] said it also had inserted
Ebola clauses, although it declined to give details.
With the Ebola outbreak -- that has killed nearly 5,000 people since
March, mostly in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone -- still evolving,
companies are concerned that any disruption it does cause would not
be covered by standard contracts.
"It may be unclear whether contracts as currently drafted address
the rights and obligations of parties in this unique and constantly
evolving situation," said Jonathan Moss of law firm DWF.
"Parties may disagree as to whether the adverse consequences of
Ebola fit within 'force majeure' or other provisions in contracts."
A force majeure frees a company from contractual deliveries due to
actions beyond its control.
Among the stipulations in the various Ebola clauses being adopted by
ship owners are requirements for firms chartering their ships to
find alternative ports if there is risk to the crew, to keep
protective equipment on board, pay for medical expenses that crew
members may incur, as well as other unforeseen costs including
possible fines and delivery delays.
"Exactly how a situation will look like if the ship is ordered to a
place where the crew will be in danger is yet to be seen, but we
will not take any risks to crews going there if we ever come to such
a situation," said Stena Weco's Managing Director Erik Hanell.
POTENTIAL DISPUTES
The International Maritime Organization has urged against any
general ban on international travel or trade due to Ebola.
"The movement of ships, including the handling of cargo and goods,
to and from the affected areas, should continue as normal, in order
to reduce the isolation and economic hardship of the affected
countries," the IMO's Andy Winbow said.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon reiterated that message on
Monday, saying: “I have been urging all major international airlines
and major shipping service lines to continue their normal trade and
movement and transportations."
[to top of second column] |
But ports across the globe have tightened entry procedures for ships
that have sailed from West Africa. Some have halted entry altogether
in some instances.
Malta stopped a cargo vessel that was traveling from Guinea to
Ukraine from entering its harbor for a medical emergency in
September due to fears the sick person on board could have been
infected with Ebola.
Last month, Mexico and Belize refused to allow the Carnival Magic
cruise ship to dock, over Ebola concerns.
The restrictions have so far been limited, but that has not stopped
some shipping companies altering their strategies to cut the
possible risks from Ebola.
Ong Choo Kiat, president of U-Ming Marine Transport, one of Taiwan's
largest shipping companies, said it was excluding calls to countries
affected by the disease.
Precious Shipping, one of Thailand's largest dry cargo owners,
states in its new charters that its ships are not to trade to Ebola
infected countries, Managing Director Khalid Hashim said.
"There will be disputes aplenty should any ship get infected on
board with Ebola due to calling at any country under the orders of
charterers, or should a ship that has called an Ebola infected
country get quarantined/delayed at a subsequent port," Hashim said
in an email to Reuters.
In a September regulatory filing, shipping group Star Bulk Carriers
Corp said that if there was a risk to crews from Ebola, its vessels
might not be able to call at ports in affected areas, potentially
hitting its bottom line.
"These uncertainties could also adversely affect our ability to
obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us or at all,"
Star Bulk said.
Oil and gas group Kosmos Energy said in a regulatory filing in
October its exploration, development and production projects in West
Africa could be delayed or interrupted should Ebola continue to
spread, which could "significantly increase costs".
(Additonal reporting by Keith Wallis in Singapore and Fredrik Dahl
in Vienna; Editing by Robin Pomeroy)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
