Washington, D.C., approves landmark civil
asset forfeiture law
Send a link to a friend
[November 19, 2014]
By John Clarke
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - District of
Columbia lawmakers approved legislation on Tuesday that makes it harder
for police to seize assets from people who are not ultimately charged
with crimes, a bill that backers say is a model for the rest of the
country.
|
The measure approved unanimously by Washington City Council
prevents assets taken by police from going to the department, and
instead earmarks them for the U.S. capital's general fund.
Forfeiture laws let police seize property from people they stop,
regardless of criminal charges. Seizures can include cash, cars and
homes, which police are permitted to keep or sell.
It has been estimated that up to 90 percent of civil forfeitures
occur without a criminal charge, according to the bill's author,
City Council member Tommy Wells. He also said the law wrongfully
gave police a financial incentive to make seizures.
The legislation overhauls the current law and provides property
owners more protection, providing due process before police or
prosecutors can seize property.
"This is absolutely a model for other states and cities," said
Darpana Sheth, an attorney for the Institute for Justice, a
nonprofit civil liberties law firm in Arlington, Virginia.
"Ideally, it would be eliminated. But short of that, reform is
welcome."
Critics say some law enforcement agencies abuse forfeiture laws,
which were created to fight organized crime.
The value of seized assets grew to $4.3 billion nationwide in 2012
from $407 million in 2001, according to the Washington Post. Over
that period, police seized $2.5 billion in cash from almost 62,000
people without warrants or indictments.
[to top of second column] |
Asset forfeiture attracted media attention after a police department
in Montgomery County, Texas, used funds to purchase a margarita
machine for office parties. Police in Worcester, Massachusetts,
purchased a Zamboni ice resurfacing machine with the funds.
Washington police have been criticized for earmarking $2.7 million
for a “special purpose fund” in anticipated proceeds from future
civil seizures.
Police Chief Cathy Lanier said in a statement the department did not
consider the funds as part of its budget.
She said the money was used to augment "confidential fund programs
(witness protection, rewards for information in homicides).”
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|