|
 Of almost 150,000 submissions to the public forum on how to
protect businesses from unfair government interference, over 95
percent were from supporters of a small group of organisations
hostile to a deal with Washington and who submitted identical or
very similar responses, two EU officials have told Reuters.
Investor protection is among the most contentious issues in the
proposed EU-U.S. trade pact because Europeans fear U.S.
multinationals would use the investor-to-state dispute settlement
(ISDS) mechanism to challenge food and environmental laws in the EU
on the grounds that these were restricting free commerce.
The hijacking of the online consultation has undermined an EU plan
to offer credible evidence of widespread concerns about arbitration
and ways to handle it. A goal of having a new EU negotiating
position on it by November cannot now be met, the officials said,
risking a broader delay.
Negotiators hope to conclude talks late next year, but there are
signs of growing scepticism on both sides of the Atlantic despite
leaders' insistence free trade can revive the economy.
 "The public consultation has not delivered a clear-cut conclusion on
investment protection. Delays to a decision are now inevitable,"
said one EU official.
Many responses to the EU survey appeared to be automated or
generated by forms filled in on campaign websites, encouraging EU
citizens to reject arbitration policy in the planned deal, the
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
The campaign reflects the way Europeans fear being forced to import
genetically-modified crops or U.S.-style chlorine-washed chicken,
while activists note how a U.S. tobacco company is using arbitration
to challenge Australia's smoking laws.
"TTIP is a very bad idea," said Natacha Cingotti, a campaigner at
Friends of the Earth Europe. "People are very worried about food
safety. ISDS is dangerous."
The Commission, which handles trade policy for the EU's 28
countries, froze negotiations with Washington on the ISDS issue and
launched its consultation in January to ease concerns.
The trade accord would create a market of 800 million people, going
well beyond the import and export of goods to tie Europe and United
States together, adding $100 billion a year to output on both sides
of the Atlantic.
The Commission closed the consultation in July and was due to report
back in early November to allow negotiations on investment with the
United States to resume. TTIP advocates believe a deal should be
sealed by the end of 2015.
But EU officials say the Commission is divided over how to draw
conclusions from such a wide range of opinions from the consultation
and given the huge volume of contributions, a decision may not come
before the end of the year.
[to top of second column] |
"MOCK PROCESS"
Even after the release of the report, the Commission is expected to
spend the coming months talking directly with interested parties and
working out what to do.
About 500 submissions came from NGOs such as trade unions, and
business associations, the EU officials said. The remainder came
from companies and private individuals.
One protest group, Corporate Europe Observatory, said in its
submission that the consultation was "a mock process leading to a
pre-determined outcome: the Commission's own agenda".
Critics, such as German Green lawmaker Reinhard Buetikofer, have
complained that the Commission failed to ask whether respondents
wanted ISDS or not, but the Commission has insisted the consultation
is not meant to be a referendum on the issue.
But the ISDS issue has sparked so much public concern that the
European Parliament, which must ratify the agreement, says it cannot
accept an EU-U.S. trade agreement that contains such provisions,
even if they are common to some 3,000 trade and investment treaties
around the world.
Germany's economy minister has also voiced resistance to ISDS in the
accord, while new European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker
says he will not accept that "the jurisdiction of courts in the EU
member states is limited by special regimes for investor disputes."
By contrast, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said last
month that it was hard to imagine a trade deal with the European
Union without strong investor protection.
(Editing by Alastair Macdonald and Janet McBride)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
