| 
						
						
						 A 
						Minute With: Hugh Grant on Hollywood, hacking and 
						celebrity 
   Send a link to a friend 
						
						[October 09, 2014] By 
						Rollo Ross  
             
						LONDON (Reuters) - Actor 
						Hugh Grant, who became the poster boy for the charming 
						British fop in romantic comedies such as "Four Weddings 
						and a Funeral" and "Notting Hill," is delighted not to 
						be part of Hollywood anymore. | 
			
            | 
				 Grant channels his feelings in his latest film, "The 
				Rewrite," as Keith, a washed up screenwriter who moves to a 
				small New York town to give a college course on the sometimes 
				cynical and occasionally realistic perils of Hollywood. The film 
				is out in UK theaters on Wednesday. 
 Grant, 54, has also been active since 2011 in the Hacked Off 
				campaign, which is dedicated to raising awareness about the 
				victims of press abuse. He gave evidence at the Leveson inquiry 
				into the culture and ethics of the British media and accused 
				several British tabloid newspapers of intruding into his 
				personal life and hacking his telephone.
 
 The actor talked to Reuters about shedding the rom-com tag, 
				leaving Hollywood and his involvement in Hacked Off.
 
				 
				Q: How do you feel about "The Rewrite" marketed as a 
				romantic comedy? Do you think that's acceptable in your eyes?
 
 A: I did have that fight with Lionsgate, who are 
				brilliant and marvelous distributors, and in the end they 
				convinced me that the marketplace is so crowded with stuff now 
				that you have to give a simple message to the public. You can't 
				say, "Oh it's a little bit of a romantic comedy with other 
				genres mixed in." It becomes too confusing. So they wore me 
				down, except I did manage to get "romantic" taken off the comedy 
				(points to film poster).
 
 Q: How do you empathize with Keith's views on Hollywood, 
				and how has your perception changed as you've gone through it?
 
 A: This character still actually loves Hollywood and 
				wants to be part of it, and he's just sad that he's not and that 
				he can't get a job. I'm not quite like that in that I'm 
				delighted not to be a part of it anymore, apart from occasional 
				dippings of my toe. That doesn't make me a better person. That's 
				just my taste.
 
 Q: Why do you not want to be part of it?
 
 A: I never really was crazy to be out there acting, 
				performing, promoting, all that kind of stuff. It's fun once in 
				a while, but for some people it's their lifeblood ... I've never 
				felt like that. I've felt that there were other things in life 
				that were equally or more interesting.
 
			[to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			Q: You've taken on the hacking trial. There are certain 
			celebrities that sell themselves to the press and there are also 
			celebrity bloggers who are untrained journalists. What's your take 
			on that, because people's personal lives are still invaded? 
 A: I think there's a very common misconception in the 
			campaign that I've been part of in that it's to do with protecting 
			celebrities from intrusion and yet it's actually nothing to do with 
			that. That's the way the Daily Mail (newspaper) will portray it, to 
			belittle it and make it look ludicrous. But it's completely a 
			non-priority for me and the campaign.
 
			It's about who really runs that country, the fact that prime 
			ministers have to call newspaper owners before they go to war to 
			make sure it's OK with the newspaper owner. And it's about that 
			incredible abuse of power (by) a few newspaper owners ... They live 
			above the law and above any code of ethics because politicians are 
			too afraid to take them on and that's what we have changed.
 Q: You've had difficulty with the press in the past. How 
			would you cope if you were a new celebrity in today's world?
 
 A: I don't know. I don't really know how it works anymore 
			except that I can see that, whereas in 1994 you didn't really have a 
			voice except from some rather grand PR statements through some PR 
			person. People now with giant Twitter followers, millions more than 
			people that read newspapers, at least they have a voice.
 
			
			 
			But as I keep saying, what I campaign about is nothing to do with 
			celebrities. I think there's always going to be a tension between 
			the amount of intrusion that a person in show business wants and the 
			amount that they get and that's never been different throughout this 
			time shift.
 (Reporting by Rollo Ross for Reuters TV. Editing by Piya Sinha-Roy 
			and Andre Grenon)
 
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |