| 
			 That's true, to an extent, but also mischaracterizes education debt 
			as holding most people back, rather than helping them get ahead. 
 Researchers and economists say there are several reasons why 
			homeownership rates have dropped among the young, as student loan 
			debt has swelled to over $1 trillion.
 
 Student loan debt "is having an impact, but it's on the margin," 
			said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics.
 
 A soft job market, low wage growth and cautious lenders are other 
			factors affecting first-time buyers, Zandi notes.
 
 Even simple delayed adolescence might play a bigger part than debt, 
			say researchers Jason Houle of Dartmouth College and Lawrence Berger 
			of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
 
 Their recent study of people who had attended college found a 
			"modest" inverse association between education debt and 
			homeownership.
 
 
			
			 
			If debt were a key factor, Houle said, homeownership rates should 
			drop as student debt increases, but that wasn't the case.
 
 "No matter how we sliced the data, we can't seem to show that people 
			with lots of debt are less likely to buy homes than people with less 
			debt," he said.
 
 MONTHLY PAYMENTS
 
 Another factor that was knocked off the blame list was monthly 
			student loan payments.
 
 While these are "not trivial," the typical monthly burden doesn't 
			deter people from buying, agreed Chris Herbert, research director 
			for the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies.
 
 The median renter under 40 faced a monthly student loan payment of 
			$150 in 2010, Herbert found in his own data analysis of the Federal 
			Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finance.
 
 And mortgage lenders consider monthly payments, not total debt, in 
			deciding how much an applicant with student loans can borrow, said 
			Matt Hackett, underwriting and operations manager for Equity Now, a 
			New York-based mortgage lender.
 
 Maximum debt-to-income ratios typically approach 45 percent, and 
			some borrowers can stretch beyond that if they have sufficient 
			savings, Hackett said.
 
 Another study concluded that today's student loan borrowers are not 
			worse off than they were a generation ago.
 
			[to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			Beth Akers and Matthew Chingas of the Brookings Institution's Brown 
			Center on Education Policy examined Survey of Consumer Finance data 
			between 1989 and 2013 for households headed by people aged 20 to 40. 
			They found that the percentage of these younger households that owed 
			education debt rose from 14 percent to 38 percent.
 The monthly payment burden for these debts, however, remained about 
			the same median 4 percent of income since 1992.
 
 The total dollar amounts were bigger, but that was offset by income 
			gains, Akers said.
 
 
			Even those with massive debts aren't necessarily precluded from 
			buying homes. About 7 percent of borrowers owed more than $50,000 
			and 2 percent owed more than $100,000 in 2013. In 1992, only one 
			percent had more than $50,000 debt.
 Akers said a quarter of the growth in student loan debt comes from 
			those pursuing more education, especially graduate degrees.
 
 "Everyone's concerned about the 7 percent, but these may be the 
			highest earners in the group," Akers said.
 
 Clearly, some borrowers are struggling with excessive debt loads, 
			and some are certainly being shut out of the housing market. But to 
			characterize a generation of college graduates as overburdened with 
			debt isn't accurate or helpful.
 
 For most people, investments in education pay off, and taking on 
			reasonable amounts of debt is a sensible way to get their degrees.
 
 (Editing by Beth Pinsker and Bernadette Baum)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |