Wall Street watchdog, US
states mull new system to clean up brokers' records
Send a link to a friend
[October 24, 2014]
By Suzanne Barlyn
LA QUINTA Calif. (Reuters) - Wall Street's
industry-funded watchdog and U.S. state securities regulators are
considering whether to develop a new type of regulatory process for
brokers to follow for erasing complaints from their public records, an
official said on Thursday.
|
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the North
American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) have been
engaged in preliminary discussions about whether to revamp the
process that most brokers use for requesting so-called "expungements,"
said Linda Fienberg, who heads FINRA's arbitration unit.
They are mulling a new process in which regulators would be more
directly involved in deciding whether details about certain
complaints by investors should be erased from a broker's record,
said Fienberg, speaking at the Public Investors Arbitration Bar
Association (PIABA) annual meeting.
Brokers who want to erase details about certain investor complaints
from their public disclosure records file their own FINRA
arbitration cases, asking for a recommendation to expunge the
information. Those who are successful must then obtain a court order
to complete the process. FINRA can oppose the court application.
Critics of FINRA's current expungement system have said that
regulatory staff, not arbitrators, should be involved in the process
from beginning to end. NASAA also supports that view, the group's
president, William Beatty, said in an interview on Thursday.
In June, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved a new
FINRA rule to ban dispute settlements between securities firms and
investors that require investors to agree to erase complaints from
brokers' public records.
Investors who claim to have lost money because of a broker's
misconduct or advice often file a case against the broker's firm in
FINRA's securities arbitration forum. Details about the complaint
then appear in the broker's publicly available disclosure report in
a free database for investors known as BrokerCheck.
[to top of second column] |
But some brokers believe those disclosures are unfair because, for
example, they sold a class of securities that their firms promoted
as safe but later failed. Some investors also know the risks they
are taking, brokers have said.
Details on how a new regulatory process would work are unclear. The
effort would require writing new rules and possible federal and
state legislation. "It's much more complicated than it may seem on
its face," Fienberg said.
FINRA and state regulators have been discussing the idea regularly
during the past few months, Fienberg said.
FINRA has been cracking down on certain types of expungement
recommendations following a PIABA study that found a 96.9 percent
success rate between mid-2009 and the end of 2011 for brokers
seeking to expunge details on cases brought by investors that were
later settled.
(Refiling to clarify headline)
(Reporting by Suzanne Barlyn; Editing by Dan Grebler)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|