Washington state court says accused
rapists cannot bear burden of proving consent
Send a link to a friend
[October 31, 2014]
By Victoria Cavaliere
SEATTLE (Reuters) - The Washington Supreme
Court on Thursday ruled the burden of proving consent cannot fall on a
defendant accused of rape, in a split decision that reversed two earlier
rulings and prompted fears that dangerous offenders could avoid
conviction.
|
The court in its 6-3 ruling reversed earlier decisions that forced
an alleged rapist to establish a preponderance of evidence that a
victim consented to sex. The court said such a burden violated
constitutionally protected rights and also wrongly interpreted
precedent set by the U.S. Supreme Court.
"When a defense necessarily negates an element of the crime charged,
the State may not shift the burden of proving that defense onto the
defendant," the ruling said.
"Requiring a defendant to do more than raise a reasonable doubt is
inconsistent with due process principles," Justice Debra Stephens
wrote, adding that doing so raises "a very real possibility of
wrongful convictions."
In a dissenting opinion, Washington Supreme Court justices wrote the
decision would undo years of progress in rape cases and could allow
some sex offenders to go free.
"In 1975, the legislature took an important step toward justice for
rape victims when it modified the laws to focus on the conduct of
the perpetrator and not the victim. Unfortunately, today's decision
by the majority reverses that progress," wrote Justice Susan Owens.
In issuing its ruling, the court reversed the conviction of a rape
defendant identified as W.R., a minor accused of rape by another
minor.
[to top of second column] |
W.R.'s defense maintained the sex was consensual and he appealed his
conviction saying his right to due process was violated when he was
forced to present the preponderance of evidence that his accuser
agreed to the contact.
"This impermissible shift in burden is not merely academic but risks
compartmentalizing forcible compulsion and consent, raising a very
real possibility of wrongful convictions," the ruling said.
(Reporting by Victoria Cavaliere in Seattle; Editing by Eric M.
Johnson)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|