|
 With the U.S.-led coalition increasing air strikes but no signs
the militants have been weakened, Congress appears ready for a
broader discussion on the operations than it was prepared to hold
during the run-up to the election.
The temporary authorization for President Barack Obama’s plan to arm
and train moderate Syrian rebels - one element of the campaign -
expires on Dec. 11, so lawmakers will have to take up that issue
when they return from recess on Nov. 12.
A handful of lawmakers are also pushing for Congress to consider a
broader Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), which
would set out guidelines for the overall effort to halt the
militants.
"We should not be asking servicemembers to go into harm’s way
without ensuring there is a political consensus in support of the
mission," said Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, a leading advocate for
an AUMF vote.
Sometime in the busy session between the elections and the start of
a new Congress in January, Obama will also have to ask Congress to
approve more funds to pay for an extended campaign. Congress approved a narrowly focused plan to arm and train Syrian
rebels in September, but that show of unity appeared unlikely to be
repeated in a Congress deeply divided along partisan lines.
When it comes to a broader authorization, the two parties cannot
agree on when a vote should take place, let alone on the content.
Republicans say a vote should be delayed until the new Congress
begins in January, by which time the Senate may have a Republican
majority. POLITICAL RISKS OF A DEBATE
Any debate on the issue, which will force members to take a public
stand, is politically risky.
[to top of second column] |
Although Americans worry about the threat of the Islamic State
militants, who have taken over parts of Syria and Iraq and beheaded
two American journalists since August, they are deeply wary of
another entanglement in the Middle East.
With an eye on presidential elections in 2016, Democrats are
reluctant to upset their anti-war base. Obama won the White House in
2008 partly because of his opposition to the Iraq War.
Republicans do not wish to be seen supporting Obama’s strategy,
which could be risky if the campaign goes badly, and may not want to
alienate the party's growing isolationist wing.
Some Republicans said they want to give Obama more tools than air
strikes to destroy the militant group, including combat troops. But
anti-war Democrats favor explicitly barring the use of American
ground troops.
(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle, additional reporting by Roberta
Rampton; Editing by Caren Bohan, David Storey and Ken Wills)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
