Plaintiffs accused Apple, Google, Intel and
Adobe of conspiring to avoid poaching each other's employees.
Last month, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California
rejected a proposed $324.5 million settlement in the class
action case, saying it was too low.
In the court filing on Wednesday, both sides said they had
resumed mediation with a retired judge but provided no
additional details on the talks. They also asked Koh to set a
new trial date.
An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment. Intel and Adobe also
declined to comment. Representatives for the plaintiffs, along
with Google, could not immediately be reached.
Tech employees alleged that the conspiracy limited their job
mobility and, as a result, kept a lid on salaries. The case,
filed in 2011, has been closely watched because of the
possibility of big damages being awarded and for the opportunity
of a glimpse into the world of some of America's elite tech
firms.
Plaintiffs based their case largely on emails in which Apple's
late co-founder, Steve Jobs, former Google Chief Executive
Officer Eric Schmidt and some of their rivals hatched plans to
avoid poaching each other's prized engineers.
In rejecting the proposed settlement, Koh cited "substantial and
compelling evidence" that Jobs "was a, if not the, central
figure in the alleged conspiracy." Given the strength of the
case against the companies, the plaintiffs should have gotten
more money, Koh wrote.
A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 10.
The case is In Re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California 11-cv-2509.
(Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Meredith Mazzilli and
Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|
|