| 
			 After sinking into his seat at the center of the cavernous 
			interior of a C-17 military transport plane, he cradled his head in 
			his palm, put his feet on a desk and shut his eyes. 
 Visibly tired, too, were his retinue of aides as they took their 
			seats, some clutching briefing papers with notes scribbled in the 
			margin from meetings with Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi and 
			the government he had formed a day earlier on Sept. 9.
 
 Kerry’s exhaustion was understandable after nearly 24 hours of 
			non-stop travel and meetings.
 
 America’s fatigue in the Middle East could be a different story: the 
			Iraqis who met Kerry may wonder if his boss, President Barack Obama, 
			has the energy or stomach for what lies ahead in a country he has 
			spent most of his nearly six years in office trying to leave behind.
 
 The challenge is highlighted by a Reuters/Ipsos poll on Friday 
			showing that while Americans support Obama's campaign of airstrikes 
			against Islamic State militants, they have a low appetite for a long 
			campaign against the group.
 
 Several important tests loom for the U.S. administration's nascent 
			coalition to “degrade and defeat” the ultra-hardline Islamic State 
			whose militants have seized a third of both Iraq and Syria, declared 
			war on the West and beheaded two American journalists and one 
			British aid worker.
 
			
			 
 The complexity of eliminating Islamic State, which requires 
			stabilizing Iraq, building up its armed forces and creating a 
			western-backed rebel force in Syria, could take years, testing 
			Obama's commitment and that of whoever succeeds him in 2017.
 
 "There’s a real general distrust among our regional allies about our 
			commitment to this because we've been missing in action for the last 
			three years," said David Schenker, a specialist on Syria at the 
			Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former Pentagon 
			adviser on Syria during President George W. Bush’s administration.
 
 In Baghdad, Amman, Jeddah, Ankara, Cairo and Paris in the last week, 
			Kerry laid plans for a U.S.-led coalition of regional and outside 
			powers. It would hammer the black-clad fighters of Islamic State 
			militarily, dry up its funding, eliminate its safe havens in Syria, 
			block its ability to recruit fighters and try to extinguish its 
			extremist ideology.
 
 Kerry, who will report on his trip to Obama and Congress this week, 
			insists this is different from past U.S. operations in the region.
 
 "This is not the Gulf War of 1991," he told reporters in Paris on 
			Monday.
 
 "And it's not the Iraq War of 2003 ... We're not building a military 
			coalition for an invasion. We're building a military coalition 
			together with all the other pieces for a transformation, as well as 
			for the elimination of ISIL itself," he said, invoking an acronym 
			for the Islamic State group.
 
 QUESTION OF COMMITMENT
 
 World powers meeting in Paris on Monday gave a symbolic boost to 
			that effort, publicly backing military action to fight Islamic State 
			militants in Iraq.
 
 
			
			 
			France sent jets on a reconnaissance mission to Iraq, a step towards 
			becoming the first ally to join the U.S.-led air campaign there and 
			a senior U.S. official said some Arab countries had promised to take 
			part.
 
 On Friday, Kerry will chair a meeting of the U.N. Security Council 
			in New York, which will provide countries which quietly backed the 
			U.S. coalition an opportunity to do so publicly.
 
 But questions remain over how far each will commit to a fight that 
			U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said on Tuesday "will not be an 
			easy or brief effort."
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			A 45-page State Department document detailed offers of assistance 
			from about 40 countries, but these are mostly humanitarian. Military 
			commitments are rare and small. Albania, for instance, plans to 
			provide 22 million rounds of AK-47 bullets, 15,000 hand grenades and 
			32,000 artillery shells to Kurdish forces in Iraq. 
			 U.S. fighter jets have conducted over 160 airstrikes on Islamic 
			State positions in Iraq, resuming military action Obama and many 
			Americans hoped were part of history when U.S. combat forces pulled 
			out of the country in 2011.
 The most senior U.S. military officer, General Martin Dempsey, 
			raised the possibility on Tuesday that American troops might need to 
			take on a larger role in Iraq's ground war, though Obama also ruled 
			out a combat mission.
 
 U.S. officials play down the prospect of imminent air attacks on the 
			Islamist group's heartland in Syria and it remains unclear who, if 
			anyone, would join them.
 
 The United States will present a legal case before going into Syria, 
			U.S. officials say, justifying strikes largely on the basis of 
			defending Iraq from militants who threaten its sovereignty and have 
			taken shelter in neighboring Syria during its three-year-old civil 
			war.
 
 "OVERALL COORDINATOR"
 
 Entering Syrian airspace would deepen a conflict that already cuts 
			across sectarian lines. Islamic State is made up of Sunni militants 
			fighting a Shi'ite-led government in Iraq and a government in Syria 
			led by members of a Shi'ite offshoot sect.
 
 Briefing U.S. reporters in Paris, Kerry said there were "several 
			discussions with foreign ministers" on how to defeat Islamic State 
			inside Syria. He did not go into specifics, but he emphasized that 
			it was not just about the airstrikes.
 
			
			 
 Kerry and his advisers often describe the anti-Islamic State 
			campaign as "holistic". The approach was set out in a six-paragraph 
			communique issued on Sept. 11 and signed by 10 Arab countries - 
			Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and six Gulf states including rich 
			rivals Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
 
 The Arab states agreed to eight main tasks: stopping the flow of 
			foreign fighters, countering Islamic State financing, repudiating 
			their ideology, ending impunity, providing humanitarian relief, 
			reconstruction of Islamic State-hit areas, supporting states that 
			face "acute" Islamic State threats, and, "as appropriate, joining in 
			the many aspects of a coordinated military campaign."
 
 The United States specifically wanted the words "as appropriate," 
			one senior State Department official said.
 
 "We wanted to be an overall coordinator of this effort," the 
			official said. "So, ‘as appropriate’ means as part of an overall 
			campaign plan, and as this continues to move forward."
 
 (Reporting by Jason Szep; Editing by David Storey and Howard Goller)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |