|
 "I still want to think the best of people, but there is a part of
me that was changed," said McCabe, who was 24 in 1997 when Gulf War
veteran McVeigh was sentenced to death. "That natural instinct I had
to think that people had the best intentions; after the trial, I
didn't feel that way anymore."
Jury members in the Boston Marathon bombing trial may be in for a
similarly formative experience on Monday. That's when they will
begin their formal deliberations over whether Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is
guilty of killing three people and injuring 264 at the race's finish
line on April 15, 2013, and fatally shooting a police officer three
days later.
About six out of ten jurors who sit on capital trials describe the
experience as "emotionally upsetting," according to a 2008 study by
Michael Antonio, a professor of criminal justice at West Chester
University of Pennsylvania.
More than a third of 1,198 jurors who sat on 353 capital juries also
experienced physical symptoms of stress during or after the trials,
he said.
 "It's not an easy job," said Jim Manspeaker, who retired in 2003
from a 41-year-long career as clerk of the federal district court in
Denver, where McVeigh's trial was held. "Jury duty is a big
responsibility. There is no question."
GRAPHIC ACCOUNTS
During the 16 days of testimony, the 12 jurors and six alternates
heard gripping, and sometimes graphic, accounts of how the twin
pressure-cooker bombs ripped through the crowd at the marathon,
causing 17 people to lose limbs.
They saw autopsy photos of the mangled bodies of restaurant manager
Krystle Campbell, 29, and Chinese graduate student Lingzi Lu, 23.
They also heard from William Richard, who described making the
decision to leave his wife with his dying son, 8-year-old Martin, so
he could try to save their 7-year-old daughter, Jane.
The jurors will now decide whether Tsarnaev, 21, is guilty of the 30
criminal counts he faces. Their conclusion will likely be made
easier by the fact that Tsarnaev's lawyers opened the trial on March
4 with the blunt admission: "It was him."
Defense lawyers contend that Tsarnaev's older brother, Tamerlan, who
died following a gunfight with police three days after the attack,
was the driving force behind the bombing.
But deciding guilt is only the first half of this jury's job. If
they find Dzhokhar Tsarnaev guilty, they will then hear another
round of testimony, before deciding whether to sentence him to life
in prison without possibility of parole or to death.
The toll of sentencing a person to die can often hit jurors heaviest
after their service ends, said West Chester University's Antonio.
"During the trial, it's a struggle, but they have the other jurors
that they're doing this with," Antonio said. "It's after the trial
that the reality hits. We have lots of accounts of people who get to
the parking lot, and then it hits them, 'Wow, I just sentenced
someone to death.'"
[to top of second column] |
EMOTIONAL TOLL
The sentencing decision is likely to be the most controversial part
of the case. Thousands of Boston residents were crowded around the
finish line when the bombs went off and hundreds of thousands hid in
their homes four days later, during a massive manhunt for the
brothers.
While anger runs high against Tsarnaev, the death penalty remains
unpopular in liberal-leaning Boston.
The jurors will be "criticized no matter what they do," Antonio
said.
After troubling trials, some courts bring in counselors, or, as in
the McVeigh case, have judges de-brief the jurors.
But offering such assistance is not routine, said Janvier Slick, a
clinical social worker hired by some trial courts in Oregon to
counsel jurors after difficult cases, including the trial of
Christian Longo, whom a jury sentenced to death in 2003 for the
murder of his wife and three young children.
"Usually, when the jurors are dismissed, that's that," said Slick.
"The court is done with them."
An official at Boston federal court said that Tsarnaev jurors would
be offered counseling after the trial by the U.S. Public Health
Service.
"The District of Massachusetts is prepared to offer these services
following the completion of the trial," the official said.
McCabe, now 42, recalled that all 12 jurors in the McVeigh case
cried in the deliberation room.
"It's like if we could say he wasn't guilty, then it wouldn't have
been true and the bombings would have never happened," recalled
McCabe, who changed her last name from Stedman after getting married
12 years ago.
Now, 18 years on, she is starting to put the experience behind her.
"The trial didn't disturb me to the core," said the mother of three
who works in medical sales. "I'm not one to dwell."
(Editing by Scott Malone and Bernadette Baum)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
