|
 "Look, the president needs to sell this to the American people,
and Congress needs to be involved," said Senator Bob Corker,
chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Corker did not condemn the framework deal reached by Iran and major
powers in Switzerland on Thursday after months of negotiations, but
he cited concerns over inspection provisions and differing accounts
from Washington and Tehran over what was actually agreed.
The Tennessee Republican said his committee will go ahead with a
planned April 14 vote on legislation requiring President Barack
Obama to submit a final nuclear agreement to Congress for review and
approval. The deal reached last Thursday is supposed to be the
framework for a final agreement to be struck by the end of June.
The bill, supported by both Republicans and many Democrats, would
prohibit Obama from suspending sanctions on Iran during a 60-day
congressional review. In that period, Congress could approve or
disapprove the agreement, or take no action.
Corker told Fox News on Sunday that he had backing from key
Democrats for the bill, including New York Senator Chuck Schumer, a
prominent Jewish lawmaker who is line to be the new Senate
Democratic leader in early 2017. Israel has been strongly critical
of the nuclear deal.
Corker acknowledged he did not know if backers of the legislation in
the Senate would have the 67 votes needed to override an expected
veto by Obama, who says passing the measure would undermine the
negotiations with Iran.
"I don’t know if we have 67 votes. ... We have 64 or 65 that we are
aware of today. There are many more that are considering this,"
Corker said.
In an interview with the New York Times published on Sunday, Obama
sought to avoid confrontation with Corker and said he hoped a
compromise could be reached - but one that would not encroach on
presidential prerogatives.
"I do think Senator Corker ... is somebody who is sincerely
concerned about this issue and is a good and decent man, and my hope
is that we can find something that allows Congress to express itself
but does not encroach on traditional presidential prerogatives — and
ensures that, if in fact we get a good deal, that we can go ahead
and implement it," Obama said.
DEMOCRATS HOLD THE KEY
With Republicans mostly united on the issue, and some, including
potential 2016 presidential candidates, fiercely condemning the
deal, the key role likely will be played by lawmakers from Obama's
Democratic Party.
Many do not trust Iran and fear the verification measures are not
adequate. They face energetic lobbying by Israel, whose prime
minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, says the deal as currently configured
threatens his country's security.
[to top of second column] |
While many Democrats are skeptical of Iran, they may be unwilling to
hand the U.S. president a major foreign policy defeat.
"Wavering Senate Democrats have been circumspect about the deal
reached in Switzerland," said Daniel Harsha, a former Democratic
staffer on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Until the agreement is finalized and Secretary of State John Kerry
testifies about it on Capitol Hill, "you aren't likely to see many
Senate Democrats, even those who have publicly backed new sanctions
legislation ... publicly pan the agreement," said Harsha, now at
Harvard University's Kennedy School.
The agreement reached in Lausanne, Switzerland, would ease economic
sanctions on Tehran in return for strict limits on its nuclear
sites, centrifuges that can enrich uranium and enriched uranium
stockpiles.
Both Corker and Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican,
previewed another possible Republican strategy.
If the final agreement with Iran is flawed, they argued, it would be
better to keep in place an initial interim deal reached with Iran in
November 2013, which contains limits on Tehran's ability to enrich
uranium that could be used for a nuclear weapon. All sides believe
that is being observed.
"That's one way of looking at this program - keeping the interim
deal in place that's been fairly successful, and have a new crack at
it with a new president," Graham said on CBS' Face the Nation
program.
Even if this strategy were adopted by the United States, however, it
was unclear how it would play with the five other powers engaged in
the negotiations with Iran - Britain, China, France, Germany and
Russia.
(Additional reporting by Howard Schneider and Yeganeh Torbati;
Editing by David Storey, Frances Kerry and Dan Grebler)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
