A tweet comparing fracking to rape raised the ante. 
 
Two bills making their way through the Texas Legislature call for state 
regulations to supersede any local government action concerning hydraulic 
fracturing, the process of extracting oil and natural gas by using a mixture of 
water, sand and chemicals pumped into a well at high pressure. 
 
Even though Texas is practically synonymous with oil and gas production, in 
November the city of Denton passed an ordinance making it the first community to 
approve a ban on fracking in city limits. 
 
The ban passed with 59 percent voting in favor.  
 
What’s been called the “Denton fracking bill” has dominated the discussion in 
the Texas Statehouse in Austin. Last week, one of the leaders of the 
anti-fracking movement in north Texas sent a Twitter message protesting a vote 
in the Texas House. 
 
Sharon Wilson posted, “Texas fracking rape scheduled today as legislators pass 
HB 40, a bill that STRIPS control from cities allowing oil & gas to RAPE people 
living there.” 
 
Tweet from @TXsharon on March 30 
 
“The people I’ve worked with who have experienced this in their backyards have 
described it as a feeling of rape,” Wilson said in a telephone interview. 
“They’re up against something that’s way more powerful than they are.” 
 
“This is repugnant,” said Steve Everley, spokesman for Energy In Depth, a public 
outreach campaign sponsored by the pro-industry Independent Petroleum 
Association of America. “People can disagree civilly with respect to regulation 
and energy development, and even be passionate in their views. But I think most 
of us can come together and agree that this sort of rhetoric is unacceptable.” 
 
The Washington Free Beacon, which first reported the tweet, pointed out that the 
environmental group Earthworks retweeted Wilson’s message, only to later post 
the retweet was sent out “advisedly.” 
 
earthworks response to tweet 
 
The Earthworks website lists Wilson as a member of the Earthworks staff as a 
gulf regional organizer. 
 
Wilson told Watchdog.org she had no regrets about the tweet that linked to her 
blog. “I don’t think industry has any regrets,” she said. “I’m not seeing them 
regret the impact that they cause to the people where they operate. They don’t 
even admit the impacts.” 
 
Opponents of the Denton ordinance say local restrictions create a haphazard 
system across the state and insist that authority to regulate the oil and gas 
industries rests with the Texas Railroad Commission. 
 
“Critics of this legislation are intent on allowing cities to simply shut down 
production through extreme setbacks between wells and homes, in the name of 
‘health and safety,’” Todd Staples, president of the Texas Oil & Gas 
Association, said in a statement after testifying in support of House Bill 40 
and Senate Bill 1165. 
 
[to top of second column] | 
            
             
            
			 
			Those against the legislation have accused Texas 
			lawmakers who support the bills as sell-outs to the oil and gas 
			industry, as well as small-government hypocrites. 
			 
			“Many of the bills’ proponents and authors routinely rail against 
			federal preemption of states’ rights but here they are on the other 
			side of the mouths trying to take away local rights,” said Luke 
			Metzger, director of Environment Texas. “We think it’s absolutely 
			hypocritical.” 
			
			The sponsor of the bill in the Texas House is Rep. 
			Drew Darby, R-San Angelo. 
			 
			“The constitution of the state should trump both the Legislature and 
			the local governments,” said Darby’s chief of staff, Jason Modglin. 
			“He (Darby) appreciates local control, being a local elected 
			official himself prior to joining the Legislature, but the 
			fundamental right to access and produce our minerals can’t be undone 
			by a local ordinance.” 
			 
			The bills still have to make it through the committee process in 
			each chamber before proceeding to floor votes in the House and 
			Senate. 
			 
			“Representative Darby is very confident” the legislation will pass, 
			Modglin said. 
			 
			“It’s rocketing through the Legislature right now,” Metzger said. 
			“But I think the founders and writers of the Texas Constitution set 
			up the process in a way that makes it hard to pass any bill so I 
			have not given up hope yet.” 
			 
			“I shudder to think that they might pass it,” Wilson said. “They’re 
			not listening at all to the people.” 
			 
			Should the legislation succeed, Metzger said it could lead to 
			“dozens of lawsuits.” 
			 
			“We think this is a heavy-handed approach that will have significant 
			consequences beyond Denton,” Metzger said. 
			 
			But the bills’ supporters say that in the absence of a law, oil and 
			gas lease holders in places like Denton will probably sue, alleging 
			a violation of their private property rights. 
			 
			“Cities don’t know where the bright line is,” Modglin said in a 
			telephone interview with Watchdog.org. “We’re in sort of an absence 
			of the court acting on the Denton ordinance. So the Legislature felt 
			it was their responsibility to … weigh in on how these disputes 
			should be resolved.” 
			 
			The current 140-day legislative session ends June 2, giving 
			lawmakers nearly two months to send a fracking bill to Gov. Greg 
			Abbott, a Republican. 
			 
			Although Abbott has not directly commented on the legislation, 
			earlier this year Abbott criticized what he said is “a patchwork 
			quilt of bans and rules and regulations that is eroding the Texas 
			model.” 
			
			[This 
			article courtesy of
			Watchdog.org.] 
			
            
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article  |