|
 Some Senate conservatives are threatening to insist that the
measure be fully paid for, after the House of Representatives passed
a version of the "doc fix" bill two weeks ago that would expand the
federal deficit.
Senate procedural rules confer more power on individual lawmakers,
meaning their objections could result in considerable delay and
amendments to the bill even if they are in a minority.
The House bill was a rare show of bipartisan accord, and had been
shaping up to be the 2015-2016 Republican-controlled Congress’ first
substantial achievement.
As approved by the House, the $214 billion initiative would replace
a 1990s formula that linked Medicare doctors' reimbursements to
economic growth with a new one more focused on quality of care.
Republican Speaker John Boehner and Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi
leaned across the aisle to get it passed overwhelmingly in the House
of Representatives on March 26, just before a spring break. Senate
leaders said they would take it up quickly after lawmakers return to
Washington on Monday.
But Senate conservatives, such as Republican Jeff Sessions, have
labeled the House bill irresponsible because it would add an
estimated $141 billion to the U.S. debt over the next 10 years,
according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
The CBO also said that the bill could produce small net savings in
the second decade, compared to freezing doctors' reimbursement rates
where they are now.
But the conservatives also point to an analysis by an outside budget
group -- the non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
-- that says the bill would add a whopping half-trillion dollars to
the deficit over 20 years.
“I’d like to figure out a way to pay for it," Republican Senator
Mike Lee told Reuters on Friday.
Lee is expected to offer an amendment to require Congress to find a
way to pay for the "doc fix" by the end of this year.
The conservative group Heritage Action for America, which opposes
the bill, is urging senators to strike an exemption from
congressional "pay as you go" rules that was written into the
House-passed legislation.
Striking the exemption would require Congress to enact enough
savings to cover the bill's cost by the end of 2015.
[to top of second column] |
One of the government's largest social safety net programs, Medicare
is health insurance that serves 54 million elderly and disabled
people.
House Speaker John Boehner on Friday urged lawmakers to see the bill
as a conservative gain. The measure requires more means-testing of
Medicare beneficiaries so that those with higher incomes pay higher
premiums.
“This bill represents the first real entitlement reform in nearly
two decades, and CBO and other experts have confirmed that it will
save taxpayer dollars over the long term," Boehner said in an
emailed statement.
Any significant delay by the Senate would trigger sharp cuts in
reimbursements to doctors who participate in the Medicare program
for the elderly. The federal government warned Congress last week
that it must act before April 15 or thousands of Medicare doctors
nationwide will face a 21 percent pay cut under the old
reimbursement formula.
However, Senator Ron Wyden, the ranking Democrat on the Finance
Committee, said on Thursday that the doctors would be paid in full
later at the new rate once the bill passes, because as written the
measure is retroactive to April 1.
Senate Democrats may also seek to amend the measure. It includes a
two-year extension of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
for low-income children, but Senate Democrats would prefer this to
be four years.
Any Senate change in the bill would also send it back to the House,
signaling further delay.
(Reporting by Susan Cornwell; additional reporting by Richard Cowan;
editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Stuart Grudgings)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
