| 
            
			 Concern that it could be forced to retreat to near-zero interest 
			rates, where the Fed has little room to maneuver, if it pulled the 
			trigger too soon has been a significant reason the Fed has kept 
			rates pinned to the floor well into the recovery. With that less of 
			a threat, policymakers can now focus on charting an appropriate rate 
			path and worry less about sliding back to zero, Williams said in an 
			interview late on Friday, expressing a view that appears to have 
			taken root more broadly at the central bank. 
			 
			"As we go through time, that probability of saying 'well, the shocks 
			are going to push us back,' seems to be less, seems to be 
			decreasing," said Williams, who this year is one of 10 voting 
			members of the Fed's policy panel and whose views are seen as 
			closely aligned with Chair Janet Yellen. 
			 
			"More importantly, we are really thinking about a path, we are 
			talking about moving interest rates from zero to a normal level over 
			several years," he said, echoing recent comments by several other 
			Fed policymakers. 
			  
			"So even if the economy got some bad shocks, really you are probably 
			just talking about flattening that path out a bit, or maybe raising 
			rates more slowly." 
			 
			LIFT-OFF, DATA AND T-SHIRTS 
			 
			To get that message across Williams has begun giving away T-shirts, 
			printed at his own expense, showing an arrow busting upwards out of 
			a computer and declaring: "Monetary policy -- It's data dependent." 
			 
			The slogan captures a shift increasingly evident in the language of 
			some of the Fed's most influential policymakers - away from concerns 
			about acting “too early” toward a focus on calibrating rates in a 
			way that will sustain steady recovery. 
			 
			In fact, the Fed now needs to weigh the risks of waiting too long 
			before a rate lift-off, Williams said. The concern is a late start 
			to rate increases could force the Fed to tighten policy more 
			aggressively and potentially disruptively if stronger economic 
			growth sparks inflation pressures. 
			 
			"A little earlier and more gradual versus later and more aggressive: 
			those are the options we have," Williams said. 
			 
			To be sure, some policymakers, notably the presidents of the 
			Minneapolis and Chicago Fed banks, still argue that raising rates 
			too soon poses a bigger risk than waiting too long. 
			 
			Economists last month pushed their expectations of a rate hike later 
			into 2015 from mid-year after the Fed downgraded its economic 
			outlook. However, recent policymaker comments suggest the Fed would 
			be still poised to act if data over the next two months confirmed 
			continued job growth and an expected rebound from the weak start to 
			the year. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
  
			  
			In the last two weeks, three Fed governors have laid out the 
			argument that it is the longer rate path, not the date of lift-off, 
			that matters. Jerome Powell in New York last week made the direct 
			case that the Fed should not wait to act until its goals of full 
			employment and 2-percent inflation are in view. 
			As the U.S economy nears full employment, there is less need to keep 
			rates near zero for long to compensate for the central bank's 
			inability to cut rates further in case of a shock, Williams said. 
			 
			He also said that regardless of the timing of the first hike, rates 
			should stay below neutral to help the economy grow at a 
			faster-than-normal pace. Such accommodative policy is necessary to 
			further reduce unemployment, which at 5.5 percent is still too high 
			in his view, and push up inflation, which remains well below the 
			Fed's 2-percent target. 
			 
			The San Francisco Fed chief expects the U.S. economy to reach full 
			employment in six to twelve months, and forecasts a tighter labor 
			market will start lifting wages and inflation more broadly. 
			 
			Comments from Fed officials and forecasts published in March suggest 
			a majority of policymakers is prepared to raise rates either in June 
			or during the June to September period, but Williams declined to be 
			pinned down. 
			  
			
			  
			 
			"June is a long ways off, we’ll get more data before June," he said. 
			"I am not going to talk about June or September. Look at the shirt!” 
			 
			(Additional reporting by Howard Schneider and Jonathan Spicer; 
			Editing by Tomasz Janowski) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |