| 
				 A play called "Double Falsehood" published in 1728 by a man 
				who claimed it was based on a lost Shakespeare play but has long 
				been dismissed as a forgery may indeed be the real deal. 
 University of Texas researchers have unveiled a sophisticated 
				new study of "Double Falsehood" that used text-analyzing 
				software that helped create a "psychological signature" of the 
				playwright.
 
 "I am quite confident that Shakespeare had a direct hand in 
				writing 'Double Falsehood.' Put me down for 97 percent 
				confident," University of Texas social psychologist James 
				Pennebaker, co-author of the study published in the journal 
				Psychological Science, said on Friday.
 
 "Double Falsehood" was published by Shakespeare expert Lewis 
				Theobald, who said it was based on Shakespearean manuscripts 
				later destroyed in a fire. Many experts considered it an 
				original work by Theobald that he sought to pass off as 
				Shakespearean. The lost play is thought to be "The History of 
				Cardenio."
 
				
				 Recent scholarship has reopened the debate. In 2010, Nottingham 
				University literary expert Brean Hammond said he was convinced 
				the play was Shakespearean.
 Pennebaker and fellow University of Texas social psychologist 
				Ryan Boyd examined 33 Shakespearean plays, 12 by Theobald and 
				nine by John Fletcher, Shakespeare's occasional collaborator. 
				The texts were scrutinized for the use of pronouns, articles and 
				prepositions, words relating to emotions, family, sensory 
				perception and religion and other qualities.
 
			[to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			  
			In doing so, the researchers formulated a psychological signature 
			for each author.
 "We find that the profile of this play very closely matches the 
			psychological profile of Shakespeare, and also find some parts where 
			the psychological profile is very close to Fletcher," Boyd said.
 
 "Really, there's just very, very little similarity to Theobald to 
			the point that it is practically impossible that he wrote it," Boyd 
			said.
 
 Pennebaker noted that Theobald was considered to be "orderly, 
			structured, detailed and rigid" and his language matched that 
			profile. "The writing of 'Double Falsehood' suggested that the 
			author was reasonably sociable, more relaxed, and educated, someone 
			like Shakespeare," Pennebaker added.
 
 Boyd suspects this is not the final word on the matter.
 
 "One thing I can say for sure is that I don't think any amount of 
			evidence is going to stop people from debating about who actually 
			wrote it. That being said, I think this is pretty convincing," Boyd 
			said.
 
 (Reporting by Will Dunham; Editing by Eric Beech)
 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |