| 
             
			
			 The messages are highlighted in the association's new guidelines for 
			employers who want to promote heart health in increasingly popular 
			"workplace wellness" programs. They are: stop smoking, get active, 
			lose weight, eat better, manage blood pressure, control cholesterol 
			and reduce blood sugar. 
			 
			Employers who incorporate the AHA’s “Life’s Simple 7” plan into 
			their programs will have healthier employees, the AHA advisory panel 
			wrote in Circulation. 
			 
			“There are about 155 million working Americans today, that’s about 
			half of our population,” said Dr. Elliott M. Antman, senior 
			physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and president of 
			the American Heart Association. 
			 
			It makes sense to target education and intervention efforts at this 
			large group using workplace wellness programs, he said. 
			 
			“We want to inform people about what heart-healthy living involves 
			and have companies recognized for promoting heart health,” Antman 
			told Reuters Health by phone. “We hope the lessons learned from that 
			environment will be carried home so workers’ spouses and family will 
			benefit as well.” 
			
			  
			 
			A “comprehensive” workplace wellness program must include health 
			education, supportive social and physical environments, integration 
			into other organizational initiatives, links to other programs like 
			employee health and safety, and wellness screenings. Employers need 
			high-quality models to develop and implement effective programs, 
			according to the AHA recommendations. 
			 
			Antman referred to the AHA’s My Life Check online tool (http://mylifecheck.heart.org/mobile/assessment.aspx), 
			which rates an individual’s level of heart health based on the 
			Life’s Simple 7 criteria and assigns an overall score out of 10. 
			 
			This tool gives individuals a sense of their heart health. Employee 
			scores can be averaged to give a whole company an idea of how well 
			they are promoting healthy behavior, he said. 
			 
			“Companies can track progress over time, which is different than 
			what is available now,” Antman said. 
			 
			Each workplace is different, so there is no one-size-fits-all 
			approach to workplace wellness, he said – some employers may have a 
			gym in the building or access to one off-site, but may need to 
			improve the food offered at the cafeteria, or provide more walking 
			space. 
			 
			Antman hopes that by recognizing employers who have effectively 
			implemented a program, the AHA will inspire more and more companies 
			to take part. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
				
			Other recognition programs, like HealthLead and Wellness Council of 
			America’s Well Workplace Awards, are inconsistent with each other 
			and do not focus specifically on heart health, according to the AHA 
			advisory. 
			 
			“It can be confusing, not knowing which scorecard you want to use 
			for your program,” said Julie Stich, director of research for the 
			International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans. 
			 
			If an employer has noted that heart problems are one of their most 
			frequent employee health issues, then this new AHA scoring system 
			may be useful, Stich told Reuters Health by phone. It seems 
			straightforward and incorporates many aspects that companies already 
			include in their programs, she said. 
			But many employers still don’t have a clear picture of health status 
			in the workplace, she said. Those who do most commonly cite diabetes 
			as the biggest issue, with heart disease coming second, she said. 
			 
			Health benefits and missed days of work due to illness are among the 
			biggest employer expenses, Antman noted, and investing in a wellness 
			program should yield higher productivity and decreased expenses. 
			 
			For smaller companies, there are low cost or no-cost wellness 
			options, Stich said. But, she added, it can take three to five years 
			before you can measure the impact of a wellness program. 
			 
			SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1q3uqj1 
			Circulation, online April 13, 2015. 
			  
			 
			 
			(Refiles to revise para 13 to clarify that the two programs are 
			inconsistent with each other, not internally inconsistent.) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |