| 
            
			 The issue is a backdrop for almost any global economic affairs 
			debate in Washington, with many Democrats and their backers arguing 
			that free-trade deals help big corporations, but drive American jobs 
			abroad to cheaper labor markets. 
			 
			On Thursday, the debate rose to a full boil when members of Congress 
			from both parties announced legislation that would give President 
			Barack Obama the "fast-track" trade negotiating authority he needs 
			to complete a massive Asia-Pacific free-trade deal. 
			 
			Over two days of campaigning in Iowa this week, where she discussed 
			economics, Clinton, who is the commanding front-runner to be the 
			Democratic nominee for the 2016 election, uttered not a word about 
			the potential Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) between the United 
			States and 11 other Pacific Rim countries. 
			 
			If Obama does not get fast-track "trade promotion authority" (TPA) 
			from Congress setting rules for debating TPP, it will be nearly 
			impossible to complete the sprawling pact that aims to lower trade 
			barriers and further stimulate trade with countries ranging from 
			Australia, Japan and Chile to Singapore and Vietnam. 
			
			  The TPA fight in Congress could be over this year, long before the 
			election campaigns really heat up. But if Congress approves 
			fast-track, the second chapter - an up-or-down vote by Congress on 
			whatever TPP deal Obama agrees to - could be raging as the November 
			2016 election nears. 
			 
			"She puts herself in a very difficult position no matter what she 
			says" about trade, said Paul Sracic, who heads Youngstown State 
			University's Politics and International Relations Department in Ohio 
			and focuses on global trade. 
			 
			That is because Clinton, who has spent decades in the national 
			limelight including as secretary of state from 2009-2013, could face 
			attacks from many angles, especially in swing states like Ohio that 
			could decide who wins the White House. 
			 
			If Clinton were to align herself with the labor unions - a position 
			that would also put her in the same camp as conservative Tea Party 
			Republicans - that are already trying to defeat TPA and TPP, she 
			could win points in Ohio, Nevada and other states rich in organized 
			labor votes. 
			 
			But at the same time, she would be distancing herself from some of 
			the work she did when she was a top official in the Obama 
			administration at the exact time Obama, her ex-boss, is traveling 
			the country selling the free-trade deal. 
			 
			"One of her primary accomplishments as secretary of state was the 
			so-called Asia pivot" that refocused U.S. diplomacy away from the 
			Middle East and toward the Asian countries that are central to the 
			TPP, Sracic noted. 
			 
			Conversely, if Clinton were to embrace the pact and campaign on it, 
			she would put herself at odds with Democratic stalwarts such as 
			former Ohio Governor Ted Strickland who is running for a Senate seat 
			and Senator Sherrod Brown, also from Ohio, who opposes the 
			fast-track legislation as drafted and is prodding Clinton to make 
			her views known. 
			 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			CAUTIOUS RESPONSE SO FAR 
			 
			For the moment, Clinton's response was noncommittal. 
			 
			In a statement on Friday, Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said 
			Clinton believes the United States "should be willing to walk away" 
			from any trade measure that does not "protect American workers and 
			create more good jobs at home" while also strengthening national 
			security. 
			 
			Clinton, he said, "will be watching closely" to see how the final 
			deal tackles currency manipulation, labor rights and other 
			contentious issues. 
			 
			The AFL-CIO, the largest U.S. labor organization, is already working 
			to stop the trade deal and is urging its members to sign a petition 
			"and tell Congress to stop the fast-track bill; it's undemocratic 
			and bad for working families." 
			 
			Meanwhile former Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley, who is 
			considering challenging Clinton for the Democratic presidential 
			nomination, on Friday laid down a marker when he blasted TPA and 
			said, "Chasing cheaper labor abroad will not help us build a 
			stronger economy here at home." 
			 
			Labor was a power to be reckoned with when TPA was before Congress 
			in late 2001. At the time, the House of Representatives voted 
			215-214 in favor of giving then-President George W. Bush fast-track 
			negotiating authority. A mere 21 Democrats voted yes while 189 voted 
			no. 
			
			
			  
			
			 
			 
			That is a stark result that Clinton likely will weigh when forming 
			and explaining her position to voters. 
			 
			A senior House Democratic aide said Obama will "have to make a 
			strong case" for TPA and TPP and "educate a lot of people" to win 
			the day. 
			 
			(Additional reporting by Jonathan Allen n New York; Editing by Kevin 
			Drawbaugh and Frances Kerry) 
			
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |