The Bush super PAC is in fact Right to Rise. America Rising is
another political action committee, unconnected to Bush, that plans
to raise and spend unlimited sums of money, although it does share
one goal in common with Right to Rise: to defeat Hillary Clinton's
bid for the Democratic nomination in 2016.
They also share some thematic similarity with the group supporting
another Republican presidential hopeful, Wisconsin Governor Scott
Walker (Our American Revival), which isn't too different from groups
advocating for potential candidates New Jersey Governor Chris
Christie (America Leads) and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee
(Pursuing America's Greatness). (Graphic: http://reut.rs/1D8Z25I)
The bland sameness of the names means that tens of millions of
Americans may not realize who funded the television advert they just
watched denigrating or trumpeting a particular candidate. A few
blinks, and the names all run together - just as they're supposed
to, strategists told Reuters.
"Super PACs aren’t Coke and Pepsi; they’re not even Democrats or
Republicans," said Carl Forti, co-founder of the Republican
political strategy group Black Rock Group. "You don’t necessarily
want it to be a brand."
That's because many of these groups want to stay in the background
while spending hundreds of millions of dollars to support their
candidate or their cause. A group that spends most of its cash on
vicious attack ads, for example, can hide behind the anodyne gloss
of a name that is easily forgotten or confused.
So far, PACs supporting Republican presidential hopefuls are getting
the most attention because Clinton, the clear Democratic
front-runner, doesn't have one.
The best super PAC names convey commitment to a vague ideal without
using language so electrifying or catchy that it could make the name
stick too long in public memory.
FORGET YOU SAW THIS
The goal is to come up with "forgettable and almost randomized
combinations of generic political keywords," said Michael Cornfield,
an associate professor of political science at George Washington
University.
That has been taken to new heights by a new trend in the 2016
election cycle - super PACs that have been created as vehicles for
extremely wealthy individuals, often billionaires, to pursue pet
issues or back candidates. These PACs don't want to attract
attention because they don't need more donors, strategist said.
The best example of this are the four super PACs formed recently to
support Texas Senator Ted Cruz's presidential bid. All have the same
name: "Keep the Promise."
[to top of second column] |
Keep the Promise I, II and III are all backed by different
individuals who have contributed a combined $31 million. This format
will allow the backers to keep their assets separate, thereby
maintaining control over exactly how the money is spent, said Dathan
Voelter, who is managing the group of PACs.
There is another trend: unlike in 2012, the PAC names today sound
more hopeful and forward looking.
"In 2012, many super PACs had names that promoted conflict or
struggle, focusing less on the future and more on a troubled present
day," said Michael Wissot, a Republican strategist who consulted for
the super PAC American Crossroads, run by former George W. Bush
advisor Karl Rove.
"In 2012 the leadership was so determined to defeat the left-wing
incumbent (President Barack Obama) that we never fully developed our
own narrative," Wissot said. "The 2016 Republican super PACs have
names that imply a clean slate, a new beginning."
Former Texas Governor Rick Perry's PACs are an example of that
change in emphasis. In 2012, the PAC backing him was called Make Us
Great Again. This time, the super PAC for Perry is called the
Opportunity and Freedom PAC.
"That's aspirational," said Perry's close friend and supporter Allen
Blakemore, a political strategist in Texas.
Blakemore knows the perils of a bad PAC name. During the 2014
congressional elections one of his employees, acting independently,
registered a super PAC with a name no one could forget: Boats 'N
Hoes. The employee quickly dissolved the PAC amid widespread
criticism.
(Editing by Ross Colvin)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |