Senate
rejects bid to toughen Iran nuclear review bill
Send a link to a friend
[April 29, 2015]
By Patricia Zengerle
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate
rejected an effort on Tuesday to require any nuclear agreement with Iran
to be considered an international treaty, which would have forced any
deal to be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate's 100 members.
|
The Senate voted 57-39 to reject the measure, which Republican
Senator Ron Johnson offered as an amendment to the Iran Nuclear
Review Act, a bill requiring an Iran nuclear deal to be reviewed by
Congress.
The amendment's backing by 39 Republicans signaled that there could
be intense debate in the coming days as the Senate hammers out its
final version of the legislation.
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other top Senate Republicans
were among those voting for the amendment, despite an emotional
appeal against it from Senator Bob Corker, the Republican chairman
of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and author of the bill.
Corker and Senator Ben Cardin, the committee's top Democrat, have
been working against so-called "poison pill" amendments seeking to
toughen the bill, which they say would kill its chances of becoming
law by alienating Democrats and provoking a veto by Democratic
President Barack Obama.
Corker announced on Tuesday that his bill has 67 co-sponsors, enough
to override a presidential veto.
Obama had threatened to veto the bill as a threat to ongoing nuclear
negotiations with Iran until last week, when leaders of the foreign
relations panel agreed on a compromise that removed many of the
measure's strictest provisions.
Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that Washington and other
major powers were closer than ever to a deal with Iran, although
more tough talks lay ahead of a June 30 deadline for reaching a
final agreement in which Tehran would drastically scale back its
nuclear program in exchange for an easing of crippling economic
sanctions.
[to top of second column] |
The White House has made clear the veto threat would be back in
place if the measure were significantly amended as it moves through
the Senate and House of Representatives.
Many Republicans worry that Obama is so eager for a nuclear pact
that he will allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. They say a
tougher stand in Congress would help convince Tehran to compromise
in the nuclear talks.
Several backers of the bill insisted that supporting the Corker bill
was not an endorsement of a final nuclear agreement. They argued
that opposing it would take away Congress' best chance to weigh in.
(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Eric Beech, Peter Cooney
and Ken Wills)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|