| 
             
			
			 Currently a company with a drug approved for lung cancer must 
			conduct additional studies if it wants to market it for breast 
			cancer. 
			 
			A bill drafted by the House Energy & Commerce Committee's health 
			panel would eliminate the need for randomized, controlled clinical 
			trials, the gold standard for assessing whether a product is safe 
			and effective. 
			 
			Instead companies could submit data from observational studies, in 
			which researchers have no control over the experiment, ongoing 
			surveillance studies and other clinical experience. 
			 
			"Calling for the FDA to use this data is pretty revolutionary," said 
			Peter Pitts, a former FDA associate commissioner for external 
			relations and co-founder of the industry-funded Center for Medicine 
			in the Public Interest. "In the past this kind of data was not 
			considered gold standard." 
			  
			If included in the final version of the bill, known as 21st Century 
			Cures, "it really would allow the FDA to have a broader view of how 
			the drugs work in the real world," he added. 
			 
			In addition, the FDA would be allowed to approve new indications 
			based on a review of clinical data summaries, rather than full 
			packages, potentially speeding up the approval time. 
			 
			The bill would also require the agency to consider using real world 
			experience as opposed to randomized trials to support or satisfy 
			requirements for post-market studies. 
			 
			The FDA frequently approves drugs based on "surrogate" endpoints 
			that are expected to reflect clinical benefits. If a drug causes a 
			tumor to shrink there is an expectation it could also delay 
			progression of the disease or prolong life. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
				
			But companies are required to conduct additional trials to confirm 
			that the expected benefit actually materializes. The bill would 
			reduce the need for such trials. 
			 
			It would also make it easier for companies to provide economic 
			analyses to insurance companies and others involved in 
			reimbursement. A company with a high-priced drug might want to show 
			why it is more economical than others in the long run. 
			 
			An prior version of the bill was circulated for discussion earlier 
			this year. A parallel bill is being developed in the Senate. 
			 
			(Reporting by Toni Clarke in Washington; Editing by Ted Botha) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 
			   |