The Treasury Department reported last week the number of Americans who faced
fines because of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate was significantly
higher than the Obama administration expected. For 2014, the IRS projected that
roughly 6 million would face fines, but the final total was 1.5 million higher.
It was the first year in which buying health insurance was made mandatory under
the ACA, with penalties of $95 or 1 percent of total income – whichever was
higher – for people who did not comply.
The average penalty collected for the 2014 tax year was about $200, the IRS
reported.
“Although we have not yet completed our post-filing analysis, we are committed
to conducting additional outreach to taxpayers, including letters to these
specific taxpayers who did not have to report or make a payment. These letters
will inform them about available exemptions and note that they may benefit from
amending their return,” said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen.
Penalties will increase to $395 or 2 percent of income per person in 2015; that
will jump to $695 or 2.5 percent of income in 2016.
Those penalties are supposed to force Americans to purchase health insurance —
or to at least make it financially wise for them to do so.
To make it easier to buy health insurance, the ACA has a system of subsidies
tied to the federal tax code. The IRS is responsible for handing out insurance
subsidies to people who use the federal exchange — and will get to continue
doing so after last month’s high-profile Supreme Court ruling — while other
individuals’ subsidies flow through the state-level exchanges.
But an investigation by the Government Accountability Office recently revealed
that fake applicants who enrolled in health insurance programs through the
federal exchange were receiving subsidies. Those phony applicants had initially
enrolled during 2014, but they were automatically re-enrolled and continued to
benefit from tax subsidies in 2015, the GAO said.
The GAO was successful in 11 of 12 attempts to register fictitious people with
the federal health insurance exchange. In seven of those cases, the fake
applications were missing vital pieces of information, which should have raised
red flags during the approval process.
[to top of second column] |
RELATED: Obamacare punishes businesses for helping employees pay for
health care
The application process used by the Healthcare.Gov federal exchange
is not set up to detect fraud, concluded Seto Bagdoyan, chief of GAO
audits and investigations, who submitted testimony to the Senate
Finance Committee earlier this month.
“(Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services) officials told us there
have been no cases of fraudulent applications or documentation
referred to the U.S. Department of Justice or the HHS Office of
Inspector General, because its document-processing contractor has
not identified any fraud cases to CMS,” Bagdoyan said. “However, as
noted earlier, the contractor is not required to detect fraud, nor
is it equipped to do so.”
U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said the GAO report shows that the
federal health insurance exchange has “failed spectacularly.”
“The administration has known about these problems for over a year
now and has apparently not taken the necessary steps to rectify
them,” Hatch said in a statement. “It seems obvious, at least to me,
that the administration has been preoccupied with signing up as many
applicants as possible, ignoring potential fraud and integrity
issues along the way.”
Democrats on the committee downplayed concerns raised in the GAO
report, since it only dealt with fictitious people and did not seem
to hurt anyone’s access to the insurance exchanges.
“Let’s be perfectly clear about one thing: The report up for
discussion today is not about any real-world fraud,” said U.S. Sen.
Ron Wyden, D-Oregon.
Any real person who knowingly falsified information on a
HealthCare.gov application could face the prospect of a $250,000
fine.
The penalties for simply refusing to buy insurance are not that
steep — at least not yet.
But at least they are being paid by real Americans.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|