| 
            
			
			 Earnings at U.S. oil majors Exxon, which were the worst in a decade, 
			and Chevron missed analysts' expectations, adding to concerns that 
			perhaps executives had not acted quickly enough to mitigate the 
			impact of an over-50-percent drop in oil prices since last summer. 
			 
			The results highlight how smaller and more nimble U.S. shale oil 
			companies have slashed costs faster and more aggressively than 
			global majors. Some shale producers have cut back drilling by 60 
			percent or more. 
			 
			Evan Calio, an analyst with Morgan Stanley, said on Exxon's earnings 
			conference call that the oil giant appeared to be less vocal than 
			its peers about cutting costs. 
			 
			Jeff Woodbury, Exxon's head of investor relations, responded that 
			the company was constantly focused on capital efficiency and cost 
			management. 
			 
			Still, Exxon is sticking for now with its plans to spend $34 billion 
			this year, although that figure has a downward bias because of cost 
			savings and efficiencies, Woodbury said. 
			 
			Chevron also still plans to spend $35 billion this year, but said it 
			would spend less in 2016 and 2017 as several mega projects come 
			online. 
			
			  
			 
			CUTS AT EUROPEAN RIVALS 
			 
			Exxon and Chevron's European peers such as Royal Dutch Shell Plc 
			have taken more aggressive action. BP Plc cut its budget for the 
			second time this year, while Shell said it would lay off 6,500 
			workers. 
			 
			Exxon's profit fell by more than half, with the biggest drop in its 
			exploration and production business, where earnings slumped by 
			nearly $6 billion 
			 
			Chevron's profit plunged 90 percent, a starker drop and one 
			exacerbated by a $2.22 billion loss in its exploration and 
			production division. 
			 
			Pat Yarrington, Chevron's chief financial officer, seeking to head 
			off complaints about cost management, said the company had slashed 
			about $3 billion in spending so far this year, and wasn't done. 
			Still, analysts peppered her throughout the earnings call for 
			details. 
			 
			Though production grew at both companies, they missed the estimates 
			of many analysts who had expected the energy giants to pump more. 
			 
			Shares of both slumped more than 3 percent in afternoon trading. 
			 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			BRIGHT SPOT 
			 
			To be sure, the two companies benefited from their refining 
			divisions, which make gasoline and other fuels. 
			 
			Refining units tend to be far more profitable when oil prices are 
			low, providing Chevron and other integrated energy companies with an 
			internal hedge during times when core operations, such as oil 
			production, are weighed down by weak prices. 
			 
			Both companies stressed their ability to weather the price doldrums 
			and emerge stronger. 
			 
			Chevron's Chief Executive John Watson, for instance, bluntly 
			described the results as "weak." He laid off 2 percent of its staff 
			earlier this week. 
			 
			"I think in general the industry is putting a sharper pencil to cost 
			cutting," said Brian Youngberg, senior oil company analyst at Edward 
			Jones in St Louis. "I think they are realizing the days of $100 a 
			barrel (oil) are over." 
			 
			Exxon also said Friday it would slow its share repurchase program. 
			The company purchased $1 billion of its own stock in the second 
			quarter, but expects to spend roughly half of that on repurchases in 
			the third quarter. 
			 
			Chevron earlier this year scrapped its entire repurchase program. 
			 
			(Reporting by Ernest Scheyder in Williston, N.D., and Anna Driver in 
			Houston; Editing by Terry Wade and Bernadette Baum) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			  
			
			   |