On Tuesday, innovators from around the country will “demo” or share their
individual stories.
“The Demo Day event will showcase why we need to give more entrepreneurs from
all walks of life a chance to turn their ideas into indispensable products and
services, and will include new announcements that support inclusive
entrepreneurship,” the press release states.
REGULATION PRESIDENT: While President Barack Obama touts entrepreneurial
innovation, are his ever-expanding regulations killing business?
The president has a strange way of showing his support, said David Burton,
senior fellow in Economic Policy at the Institute for Economic Freedom and
Opportunity at The Heritage Foundation.
Obama, the regulation president, has created a “regulatory tsunami” that has
devoured business growth, Burton said.
“It has become genuinely absurd,” the economist said. He testified in March
before the House Small Business Committee, noting 96 things needed to change in
order to clear the way for entrepreneurs.
“We are generally crushing small businesses and entrepreneurs in this country.
It’s almost to the point where you need to be a lawyer to run a business,” he
said.
According to the Heritage Foundation, the Obama administration had issued 157
new major rules at a cost approaching $73 billion annually in its first five
years. That was a 153 percent increase over his predecessor, President George W.
Bush over his first five years in office.
It’s not always the big things but the cumulative weight of hundreds of rules
and regulations that small firms have to grapple with.
From rising taxes and ever-expanding environmental regulations, to confusing
banking rules and employment codes, the costs of government regulation is
killing U.S. business.
It’s the big things, too, like the administration’s newly proposed final rule
requiring for the first time federal limits on power plant carbon emissions.
Obama aims to cut CO2 output by 32 percent by 2030 as part of his obsessive
climate change campaign.
Obama called the final plan, released Monday, a moral obligation and declared
that it will eventually create thousands of jobs and save energy consumers as it
reduces greenhouse gasses.
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy turned a colloquial
phrase from her hometown Boston Monday in praising the regulations.
“This is an especially wicked-cool moment,” said McCarthy, who has been highly
criticized by U.S. business for her agency’s penchant for red tape.
The Obama administration estimates an $8.4 billion annual price tag to bring
down carbon emissions by 2030, but the actual cost won’t be known until states
come up with their reduction plans – expected within a year.
[to top of second column] |
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a leading Republican candidate for
president, blasted yet another unilateral move by the Obama
administration, a decision that will burden Wisconsin energy
consumers and the state’s recovering economy. The governor promptly
pledged that Wisconsin would join other states filing a lawsuit
against the administration.
“The Obama administration ignored the significant, overriding
issues that will increases costs for Wisconsin ratepayers by up to
$13 billion, unnecessarily harming families and killing
manufacturing jobs,” Walker said in a statement.
A U.S. Chamber of Commerce study last year estimated deep cuts in
CO2 could steal $51 billion in annual economic output and mean the
loss of 224,000 jobs per year through 2030. The Midwest region,
including Wisconsin, could see an average of 31,700 fewer jobs per
year.
The Heritage Foundation projected as much as $2.2 trillion in lost
gross domestic product under the reductions in output from
coal-fired power plants.
Big regulations, small regulations and the administrative rules in
between have made Obama’s “Demo Day” another big government dog and
pony show, economic experts like Burton contend.
It doesn’t help matters that the United States has the most costly
legal system in the world. Same goes for the nation’s health care
system, exacerbated by Obamacare’s imposition of high fees on firms
with 50 or more employees.
In a piece last year for the Daily Signal, Burton looked at the
troubling trends:
* The number of unincorporated self-employed persons stagnated in
the 1990s and has fallen steadily since 2006.
* The number of self-employed people today is the same as it was in
1985, even though today’s population is 34 percent larger.
* The share of firms age 16 years or more has increased by 50
percent over the past two decades. High-tech companies are shedding
more jobs than they are creating.
* The number of initial public offerings (IPOs), although recovering
with the substantial increase in equity market values over the past
several years, remains substantially lower than it has been in the
previous two decades.
“I have a daughter in grad school and if I’m in a particularly cruel
mood I explain to her and her friends all that goes into starting
and operating a business. I see their smile quickly disappear,”
Burton said. “People don’t understand the incredible burden and
complexity we are imposing on these small business owners.
“It’s becoming truly ridiculous and it is having a dramatic,
real-world impact on the ability to succeed and thrive.”
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|