| 
            
			
			 The impact of high frequency trading has come under increased 
			scrutiny since the “flash crash” last October, in which U.S. 
			Treasuries registered wild price swings in just a 12-minute period. 
			 
			Critics of high-frequency trading, a computerized strategy that can 
			move billions of dollars in fractions of a second, blame it for 
			causing excessive price swings in the bond market, which is already 
			facing a decline in liquidity. 
			 
			Federal Reserve Governor Jerome Powell acknowledged the innovation 
			that high frequency trading has brought to the bond market, but he 
			questioned how investors could value the long-term value of a bond 
			or any asset. 
			
			  
			“If trading is at nanoseconds, there won’t be a lot of 'fundamental' 
			news to trade on or much time to formulate views about the long-run 
			value of an asset; instead, trading at these speeds can become a 
			game played against order books and the market rules,” Powell said, 
			speaking on a panel at a conference on U.S. bond market structure 
			sponsored by the Brookings Institute. 
			 
			Antonio Weiss, counselor to the U.S. Treasury secretary, was 
			blunter. 
			 
			“The constant pursuit to save one more millisecond not only consumes 
			resources potentially better invested elsewhere, but increases the 
			pressure on the plumbing of the system to handle ever-increasing 
			speeds and messaging traffic,” he said in a speech prepared for 
			deliver to the panel. 
			 
			The impact of high frequency trading on the $12.5 trillion 
			Treasuries market was profound last Oct. 15, with many questions 
			still unanswered. 
			 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
  
			On that day, Treasuries trading volume exploded in a matter of 12 
			minutes. Benchmark 10-year Treasuries yields swung in a 
			37-basis-point range during that period, only to end 6 basis points 
			lower on the day, according to a report released in July by the 
			Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange 
			Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
			The report said companies that engage in algorithmic trading, or 
			Principal Trading Firms, accounted for 70 to 75 percent of total 
			trading in both the cash and futures markets, up from about 50 
			percent on “normal” days.  
			 
			Weiss said high frequency trading "is, quite simply, a disruptive 
			technological innovation, which has reshaped an entire industry 
			structure." 
			 
			Weiss and Powell said the changing bond market structure stemming 
			from the growing role of high frequency trading warrants more 
			examination. 
			 
			"Is the race for speed helping or hurting market function?" Weiss 
			said. 
			 
			(Reporting by Richard Leong; Editing by Leslie Adler) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			   |