| 
            
			 "If we turn around and nix the deal and then tell them, 'You're 
			going to have to obey our rules and sanctions anyway,' that is a 
			recipe, very quickly ... for the American dollar to cease to be the 
			reserve currency of the world," U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry 
			said at a Reuters Newsmaker event. 
			 
			Defending the July 14 Vienna agreement between Iran and world powers 
			that he helped to negotiate, Kerry deployed a new argument in a 
			feverish battle to prevent lawmakers from killing it. Congress has 
			until Sept. 17 to act. 
			 
			Kerry warned of a potential loss of U.S. financial and political 
			clout. He said this was not something that would happen overnight 
			but many countries were "chafing" under the present international 
			financial arrangements. 
			 
			He said U.S. Treasury experts "are doing a full dive on how this 
			works and what the implications are. But the notion that we can just 
			sort of diss the deal and unilaterally walk away as Congress wants 
			to do will have a profound negative impact on people's sense of 
			American leadership and reliability." 
			
			  New York-based Boris Schlossberg, managing director of FX Strategy, 
			BK Asset Management, challenged Kerry's reasoning. He said the 
			dollar’s status could be compromised only if the United States was 
			unable to compete economically on a global scale. 
			 
			“The reality of the situation is that the U.S. dollar hasn’t been 
			this strong in decades. The thought that it could be replaced as a 
			reserve currency is laughable at this point on a geopolitical basis 
			and nothing in the Iran deal even remotely touches upon that issue,” 
			he added. 
			 
			Economists and financial analysts have often conjectured that a 
			competing currency like the euro or the Chinese yuan will eventually 
			dethrone the dollar as global trade and financial patterns shift. 
			But the U.S. currency’s position has been largely immune - mostly 
			for lack of any good alternative. 
			 
			KERRY, POINT BY POINT 
			 
			In an hour-long moderated discussion, Kerry also: 
			 
			* Acknowledged that the tone of the Iran debate had taken on a 
			political edge. 
			 
			President Barack Obama last week accused critics of the deal of 
			making common cause with Iranian hardliners who chant “Death to 
			America” and said some had beaten the drum for the Iraq war. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			"You can squabble maybe with the choice of words," Kerry said when 
			asked about Obama's comments. He stressed his view that the Iran 
			deal should be argued on its merits. "I think the merits are very, 
			very strong and I think the president does too," he said. 
			
			* Said it would be impossible for Iran to create a secret program 
			for developing atomic fuel without the United States being able to 
			detect it under the deal. 
			 
			* Said the Iranians were open to discussing disputes in the Middle 
			East, where Washington and its allies accuse Tehran of backing 
			proxies in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen. 
			 
			"They said to me, 'If we can get this deal done, then we're ready to 
			sit down and talk about the regional issues and we may be able to 
			work things in different places,'" Kerry said. Iranian Foreign 
			Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif is currently in Lebanon and had 
			already visited Kuwait and Qatar in a bid to reach out, he said. 
			 
			* Said violations by Iran of an arms embargo or restrictions on its 
			missile program would not force an automatic return or "snapback" of 
			United Nations sanctions under the nuclear deal, although other 
			options would be available. 
			 
			The agreement gives Tehran some relief from economic sanctions in 
			return for strict limits on a nuclear program that the West has 
			suspected was aimed at creating a nuclear bomb. 
			 
			Tehran has long denied seeking a nuclear weapon and has insisted on 
			the right to nuclear technology for peaceful means. Obama has never 
			ruled out military force if negotiations failed, and has said that 
			he and future presidents would still have that option if Iran quit 
			the agreement. 
			
			  
			
			 
			 
			(Additional reporting by Howard Schneider, David Storey and Lesley 
			Wroughton; Editing by Howard Goller) 
			
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |