Lincoln Daily News
welcomes letters of appreciation, information and
opinion on matters pertaining to the community.
Controversial issues:
As a
community we need to be able to talk openly about
matters that affect the quality of our lives. The
most effective and least offensive manner to get
your point across is to stick to the issue
and refrain from commenting on another person's
opinion. Letters that deviate from focusing on the
issue may be rejected or edited and marked as such.
Submit a letter to the editor online |
You may also send your letters by email to
ldneditor@lincolndailynews.com
or by U.S. postal mail:
Letters to the Editor
Lincoln Daily News
601 Keokuk St.
Lincoln, IL 62656
Letters must include the writer's
name, telephone number, and postal address or email address (we
will not publish address or phone number information).
Lincoln Daily News reserves the right to edit letters to
reduce their size or to correct obvious errors.
Lincoln Daily News reserves the right to reject any letter for
any reason. Lincoln Daily News will publish as
many acceptable letters as space allows.
|
To the editor: The mayor takes a lot of shots. I knew it came with
the job and let most things bounce off my back.
I also took the advice of a wise politician who told me when I
assumed office: “People who call you want solutions; people who
write Letters to the Editor want attention.”
But when a former mayor who should know better distorts the facts
and fabricates information about what’s going on at City Hall in
order to influence an aldermanic election, I am forced to respond.
Let me clearly state a few facts about City Hall in 2015.
One, financial integrity has been restored to City
government. I probably don’t have to remind people about the
financial scandal that rocked City Hall prior to my assuming office.
A lack of financial controls and oversight led to the loss of
hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars and a felony conviction.
When I took office we hired a new, well-respected auditing firm and
implemented their recommendations. Six years of clean and strong
audits have resulted, as have six years of balanced budgets. All
City expenditures are planned for and budgeted.
Two, the new committee structure affords more participation
by the aldermen, not less. Under the old committee structure we had
a committee and a chairmanship for each alderman. That often
resulted in eight little fiefdoms going in eight different
directions. Other members with an interest in a topic outside of
their committee often were left out of discussions. The new
Committee of the Whole structure allows every alderman to be
involved in every topic. Aldermen can speak up and address any topic
of concern - to them or to their constituents. Nothing was
“circumvented.” The change was discussed openly and adopted
unanimously by all the aldermen. The old system was great for
fiefdoms and fabulous thing for those who wanted their own pocket of
control. The new system is better for the city and its citizens.
Three, Lincoln’s City government is more transparent than
ever. We follow the Open Meetings Act. Period. To the letter of the
law. We don’t hold clandestine meetings outside public view. We
discuss every topic in open session at our Committee of the Whole
meetings and voting sessions. We purposefully rebuilt our website (www.lincolnil.gov)to
post more documents than are required by law. We now post, for
everyone to see, the following: Monthly budget reports (how much is
spent in each and every line of the budget every month), City
employee salaries, annual audits, planning reports (such as the
five-year infrastructure improvement plan), contracts and agreements
(such as the employment contract with the City Administrator and the
funding agreement with the Logan County Alliance), and Council
voting packets. You read that right – people now have access to the
identical documents aldermen receive days before any Council vote.
Four, agreement among aldermen shows leadership and support
for the new direction taken by City government, not the ignoring of
constituent needs. Heated arguments and angry dissension on the
floor of the Council aren’t respectful to the citizens of Lincoln;
they indicate a lack of leadership and a lack of professionalism. I
can assure you the current aldermen and I don’t always agree. They
are not shy about telling me. Look at who sits on the Council now.
Does anybody think people like Marty Neitzel or Michelle Bauer are
shy about bringing up matters important to their wards? When
differences do arise, my style is one of listening and trying to
resolve those differences; not waiting and letting people duke it
out in debate. Nobody forces the aldermen to vote any particular
way. They are all strong-willed individuals who take seriously their
responsibility to represent the best interests of their
constituents.
[to top of second column in this letter] |
Five, City government is more professionally-run than ever.
The City of Lincoln is a $13 million annual enterprise. If we were
to succeed, it had to be run more like a business and in a more
professional manner than it was when I arrived. Here are just a few
of the things not in place in 2009 but are now: weekly department
head meetings; annual evaluations of department heads; short-term
and long-term goals for each department; budgets based on those
goals not on political whims; finance policies with strong oversight
and controls; work comp costs brought under control through a
multi-department safety committee; a new website that shares more
information; and a City Administrator.
Hiring an administrator was a big change for Lincoln, but it was
needed. Remember that $13 million enterprise that is the City?
That’s roughly the same size as Lincoln College. Would anyone expect
the college to run without a president? But what about the mayor,
you ask? Isn’t that what he’s supposed to do?
The City of Lincoln has operated for decades under the policy that
the mayor is a part-time position. That was done primarily to keep
power in check and also make sure that operationally the City could
easily transition from administration to administration. The running
of a city has become so specialized and intricate that most cities
across Illinois have had full-time and professionally managers and
administrations running their cities for decades.
When I took office I had an MBA and years of governmental
experience. I can tell you, though, that even I didn’t have the
experience to run Lincoln on a full-time basis. Those who run cities
full-time in the 21st century need experience in public budgeting,
fund accounting, labor relations, contract negotiations, government
procurement, revenue forecasting, grant writing, HR and insurance
compliance, and the list goes on and on.
The City of Lincoln requires, and its citizens should demand
professional, full-time administrative leadership at the helm every
day. Clay Johnson, our current administrator, is the consummate
professional. He provides all the experience mentioned above as well
as well-researched advice, better day-to-day coordination of all
activities, and greater operating efficiencies than were ever before
possible.
The City of Lincoln is in a different place than it was in 2009.
That’s a good thing for all of us. It’s a much better place, a much
stronger place, and a much more prepared place to meet the
challenges and the opportunities ahead.
Thank you,
Keith Snyder
Mayor
Letter written by Mayor Davis:
Letter of support for Wanda Lee
Rohlfs Ward 3 alderman candidate [Posted
February 21,
2015]
Click here to send a note to the editor about this letter.
|